Euthyphros Definition Of Piety

Euthyphros Definition Of Piety In Platos Euthyphro, the character Euthyphro endeavors to characterize the devout as what all the divine beings love. In this exposition, I will analyze the premise on which Socrates dismisses this definition. So as to do as such, I will give a diagram of the discourse for setting. Besides, I will examine what Socrates appears to require for a decent definition. At last, I will endeavor to safeguard Euthyphros definition. Socrates rejects Euthyphros definition in light of the fact that his thinking is round, yet I will contend that by expelling the certain prerequisite that there should be a reason for what the divine beings love, Euthyphros definition faces Socrates contention while falling under his necessities for a decent definition. In the Euthyphro, Socrates needs Euthyphro to teach him on meaning of the devout, as Euthyphro is viewed as an expert on every single strict issue, and Socrates accepts that by going under his tutelage he can escape Meletus charges should he indict Socrates. Socrates and Euthyphro concur that there must be one careful norm or trademark quality by which every devout thing are devout and everything offensive, as opposed to the devout, is reprobate. Socrates needs to comprehend what this quality is. Euthyphro recommends that indicting the individuals who submit shameful acts is devout, and not arraigning them is offensive, paying little mind to whom they might be. He references his arraignment of his own dad for homicide for instance. He takes note of that Zeus detained his own dad for underhandedly eating up his own youngsters. As Zeus is the best and generally just of the considerable number of divine beings (6a), in the event that he carries on appropriately in detaining his dad for bad form, Euthyphros activities must be devout for following this model. Socrates feels this is definitely not a decent meaning of devotion. He calls attention to indicting the individuals who submit shameful acts is only a case of a devout demonstration, and not a meaning of devotion itself. Euthyphro surrenders that there are a lot increasingly devout deeds that don't comprise of arraigning wrongdoers. Socrates at that point asks Euthyphro to disclose to him the basic viewpoint, by which every heavenly demonstration are sacred (6d). Euthyphro then proposes another definition: that devotion is what is pleasant to the divine beings. Socrates continues to examine whether this progressively broad definition is precise. Initially, he notes out that the divine beings themselves regularly fight, as is described in the legends that Euthyphro puts stock in so actually. Socrates calls attention to that contentions don't persevere over contested realities, since understandings can be reached through figuring or examination, but instead over inquiries of significant worth, for example, what is good and bad, and respectable and disreputable, and great and terrible (7d). Euthyphro concurs with this appraisal. Socrates calls attention to that on the off chance that the divine beings squabble about what is simply and what is acceptable, at that point there is unmistakably no understanding among them on such issues. All things considered, in the event that they have various sentiments on equity, it follows that they should affirm of various things. In this manner there must be sure things that are adored by certain divine beings and disliked by different divine beings. In any case, as per Euthyphros definition, that would imply that those things are both devout and scandalous, since they are endorsed of by certain divine beings and opposed by others. This is obviously opposing to the prior attestation that there is one standard for devotion, and concordantly for profanity since the iconoclastic is what isn't devout. Euthyphro answers that without a doubt the divine beings all concur that an individual who murders somebody unfairly ought to be rebuffed. Socrates answers that the contention isn't about whether a recognized miscreant ought to be rebuffed, yet about whether that individual has in actuality acted unreasonably. Consequently for Euthyphros contention to have any weight, he needs not to show that the divine beings concur that somebody who kills shamefully ought to be rebuffed, yet that they concur that a specific homicide is crooked in any case. The entirety of this gives us a thought regarding what Socrates thinks about a decent definition. He isn't happy with answers that relate to particular sorts of devotion, or explicit instances of devotion. The appropriate response must concern a quality that includes all types of devotion and to nothing that isn't devout. To put it plainly, a decent definition, for Socrates, requires both all inclusive statement and selectiveness. Besides, it must have logical force. An announcement of somethings insignificant traits may be valid, however would qualify as a definition since it doesn't clarify what that thing is; it just portrays a portion of that things properties. Eurthyphros reacts by changing his previous definition; he suggests that the devout is the thing that all the divine beings love, and scandalousness is the thing that they all despise. Socrates reacts by asking Euthyphro whether devout deeds are affirmed by the divine beings since they are devout or whether they are devout in light of the fact that they are endorsed by the divine beings. The point he needs to make here is that there is a contrast between being something and getting something. There are three things that can be said about any activity: (1) it is devout, (2) it gets endorsed by the divine beings, and (3) it is affirmed by the divine beings. The qualification between articulations (2) and (3) is that (2) manages the demonstration of endorsement by the divine beings and (3) manages the condition of the activity as being affirmed of by the divine beings. Causally, (3) must follow (2). The three cases Euthyphro makes are: (I) something gets endorsed by the divine beings since it is devout; (ii) something is affirmed of by the divine beings since it gets endorsed of by the divine beings (this case is verifiable); (iii) what is devout is what is affirmed of by the divine beings. The primary case (I) says that (2) is valid if (1) is valid, (ii) expresses that (3) is valid if (2) is valid, and (iii) expresses that (1) is proportionate to (3). Be that as it may, (I) and (ii) infer that on the off chance that (1) is genuine at that point (3) is valid, which isn't equivalent to stating that (1) is equivalent to (3). Regardless of whether (1) and (3) allude to something very similar, they don't have a similar importance. Along these lines Euthyphros can't guarantee that the meaning of devotion is what all the divine beings love without his thinking being roundabout. While Socratess contention is to be sure an incredible blow against Euthyphros definition, we will attempt to check whether it is at all conceivable to safeguard Euthyphros definition. One way do so is by returning to the inquiry that Socrates postures to him about whether that which is devout is adored by the divine beings since it is devout or whether it is devout in light of the fact that it is cherished by the divine beings. The inquiry expect that the divine beings need motivation to adore something, which isn't really the situation. In the event that the endorsement of the divine beings doesn't require a reason, at that point devotion can surely be characterized to be what the divine beings love without bringing on any irregularity. We note that what is devout is consistently devout. It doesn't appear to bode well that what is devout today will be reprobate tomorrow. It follows that what is devout today was devout yesterday, and what was devout yesterday was devout the day prec eding that, etc until we show up at the primary reason for devotion itself, which is characterized as what all the divine beings love. Under this system, devotion is the condition cherished by all the divine beings, however it is inane to ask what prompts the divine beings to adore something; that is, the thing that made the divine beings love it. Socrates would no uncertainty whine that this makes devotion a fairly self-assertive undertaking, however that ought not frustrate Euthyphro. It has just been certified that various divine beings can cherish various things. That demonstrates that the preferences of the divine beings are not founded on some higher standards, yet are in certainty discretionary. All things being equal, it is consistently conceivable that all the divine beings would all be able to adore something very similar. This can happen simply by some coincidence, yet that would at present not change that thing from being devout under Euthyphros definition. We note that Euthyphros definition is overall definition that incorporates all that is devout and rejects everything else, while having adequate logical force. While Socrates contention against Euthyphros definition is solid, it doesn't really refute the definition. By expelling the verifiable necessity that the divine beings need motivation to adore something, the definition holds up to both Socrates contention just as his prerequisites for a decent definition.

Compare Wal-Mart Essay

1.Compare Wal-Mart. com with Amazon.com. What highlights do the locales share practically speaking? Which are novel to Wal-Mart? To Amazon.com? Walmart.com and amazon.com have a great deal of similitudes. A portion of the normal highlights between the two incorporate setting up a client account, the two of them have the shopping basket include, both these sites have the inquiry bar at the highest point of the page, the two of them permit you to figure out items dependent on value, fame, importance, client survey, the two of them show you a rundown of things saw that coordinated what you looked for, the two of them have a blessing vault, buys made on the Wal-Mart can either be dispatched to your home or to a closest store either by Wal-bazaar or by an outsider merchant from the commercial center. Amazon also has tie ups with various sellers everywhere throughout the world that you can purchase from. The two sites graphically show client surveys for every thing. The two sites permit you to follow your request. The two destinations have the arrangements of the day. Amazon’s is called today’s arrangement and Wal-Mart’s is called estimation of the day. The main thing I discovered exceptional about Wal-Mart’s site is that it has a catch on the highest point of the page called ‘weekly ad’ that shows little coupons that clients can reclaim. Amazon doesn't have this element. Another contrast between the two sites is their arrival approach. Wal-Mart has a multi day merchandise exchange though Amazon has a multi day merchandise exchange. 2.Will Wal-Mart become the predominant e-posterior on the planet, supplanting Amazon.com, or will Amazon.com command Wal-Mart on the web? What variables would con-tribute to Wal-Mart’s accomplishment in the online commercial center? What components would bring down its capacity to overwhelm online deals the manner in which it has had the option to command physical retail deals in numerous business sectors? As of now, Amazon.com offers an a lot bigger and progressively fluctuated stock just as an assortment of highlights and advantages that Walmart.com can't coordinate. While Walmart’s retail locations have an enormous client base, a significant number of whom will go to Walmart.com for comfort, Walmart.com’s stock is for the most part made distinctly out of items that are accessible in Walmart stores. In the interim, Amazon has a huge range of items in for all intents and purposes each class possible, from everywhere throughout the world. What's more, Amazon has many utilized things that are accessible at lower costs, just as uncommon, vintage, and antique things that are not part of Walmart’s stock. Amazon likewise offers an online â€Å"marketplace,† where customers can interface with venders anyplace on the planet, analyze productsâ and costs, and once in a while even haggle with dealers. Quite a bit of Walmart’s predominance in the physical retail advertise is because of its plan of action of purchasing in such huge mass amounts that it can offer lower costs to clients, just as being a one-quit shopping goal; be that as it may, in light of the fact that Amazon clients can correlation shop between Amazon dealers, and in light of the fact that Amazon can offer an a lot bigger assortment of items, both of Walmart’s preferences are discredited. In this manner, it is far-fetched that Walmart.com will ever have the option to supplant Amazon. 3.Check the shopping helps offered at Wal-Mart. com. contrast them and those at Amazon. com. Walmart.com has an accessible database just as classes that permit clients to peruse through their accessible items. Indexed lists can be arranged by significance, value, client rating, top of the line, and so on. Clients can make profiles that store their delivery and charging data for accommodation, just as past request data. Requests can be followed on the web. Clients who scan for things at Walmart.com are likewise offered proposals for different items that may likewise intrigue them. Gift vouchers can be buy on the web, and gift voucher adjusts can be checked. Walmart.com additionally offers wedding and child library administrations, just as a â€Å"Wish List† that can be seen by others. A â€Å"Value of the Day† is offered to exhibit things that are at a bargain at even lower costs. Free transportation is frequently accessible on select buys. These shopping helps are pract ically identical to those on Amazon.com. Walmart.com offers one shopping help that Amazon doesn't have; numerous things can be dispatched to the customer’s closest Walmart store for nothing, which can prompt noteworthy investment funds. 4.What online administrations can be bought on Walmart.com? Walmart.com offers the accompanying administrations on the web: †¢Ã¢â‚¬ Straight Talk No-Contract Phones,† where clients can buy a prepaid telephone, have it conveyed to their location, and enacted on the web or via telephone; †¢Same-Day Photo Pickup,† which permits clients to transfer computerized photographs to Walmart.com, which would then be able to be moved onto photograph prints, mugs, cards, schedules, and so forth., or even onto banners or artificial canvases. The greater part of these items would then be able to be gotten up customer’s nearby store that equivalent day; †¢Ã¢â‚¬ Contact Lenses at Walmart,† which permits clients to enterâ their solution contact focal point data and request an assortment of brand-name contact focal points at deal costs; †¢Ã¢â‚¬ Enroll in a Medicare Part D Plan,† an assistance which enables qualified candidates to apply for Medicare, just as get limits at Walmart’s drug store; †¢Ã¢â‚¬ Walmart MoneyCenter,† which gives an assortment of m onetary administrations web based, including Visas, prepaid charge cards, cash moves, charge readiness administrations, and Bluebird, a â€Å"debit and checking alternative† supported by American Express that offers a considerable lot of indistinguishable administrations from customary banks. Likewise, the Walmart Pharmacy offers numerous administrations web based, including medicine tops off and conveyance. Walmart additionally has a Wellness Center that offers wellbeing tips and apparatuses on the web.

Uses of Literary Journalism Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words - 1

Employments of Literary Journalism - Essay Example Mitchell can cause us to feel as though we in reality live in this town and consider it to be a similar path as the townspeople. He invests energy depicting the graveyard which contains a significant part of the historical backdrop of the town and shows how they have pondered the world throughout the years. The people he meets are individuals who remove time from their day to converse with their neighbor, think about the climate, and appear to find a sense of contentment with themselves. The outside world doesn't generally barge in, on the grounds that they have a sense of safety in themselves. This is an amazing case of scholarly news-casting. The creator doesn't make the tale about himself, he makes it about the individuals and spots he visits. He gets inside their heads and shows us the world as observed through their eyes. It isn't simply straight announcing and the five Ws. It is a bit of scholarly news-casting in the manner it gives us something somewhat increasingly about our own reality that is difficult to place in straightforward words. It instructs us to require some investment to watch the waterway stream, similar to the individuals of Edgewater, do each day. â€Å"The First Family of Astoria† is about the Flavel family who is the most conspicuous family in the town. The story follows their history and the different things that have transpired throughout the years. A portion of these things are acceptable and some of them are awful. The Flavels get a great deal of consideration from others since they are notable, maybe in excess of a family like theirs would under different conditions. There are various outrages and treacheries. This is fringe abstract news coverage, as I would like to think. It is very reality driven and the style of composing isn't particularly abstract. The general thought behind it is that tattle can be malignant and connect to specific individuals paying little mind to what they do. That isn't too unique and is somewhat self-evident. By and large, this adds such a lot to the store of human information.

Interpretations of Platos Allegory of the Cave in Erasmus Praise of Folly - Literature Essay Samples

In the Praise of Folly, Erasmus creates a character critical of, yet indebted to, philosophical wisdom. Through Folly, Erasmus weaves his own ideas into her message, confusing readers unable to distinguish between the two voices. In Praise of Folly, Folly refers to Platos Allegory of the Cave from The Republic to enhance her statements of self-praise. Her interpretation of this philosophical piece strays from Platos intentions, and at the end of the text, Erasmus offers his reconciliation between the two accounts. Follys account revolves around the benefits of life in a material world, whereas Plato describes positive aspects of living in an immaterial realm of thought. Folly begins her lecture against the idea of Platonic enlightenment:To destroy the illusion is to ruin the whole play, for its really the illusion and make-up which hold the audiences eye. Now what else is the whole life of man but a sort of play? Actors come on wearing their different masks and all play their partsits all a sort of pretense, but its the only way to act out this farce (Erasmus 44). She reasons that life lacks substance beyond what the eyes perceive. She lives in a material world where the sense of sight controls ones outlook on life, and therefore people in her world only understand what is on the surface. The comedy of life (45) lies in the overall illusion of humankind. According to Folly, life is scripted and people play their assigned roles, oblivious to any other realms of existence. Folly finds joy in this lifestyle because it keeps the people, or her audience, engaged and allows justification for folly, or foolishness, to enter their lives. Folly finds outlets for self-praise by associating life with superficiality. She believes in the message of life as a theatrical illusion, and she refuses to accept any importance in life outside of the cave. Once Platonic enlightenment destroys lifes illusions, then it ruins the farce of Follys life. In the Allegory of the Cave, Plato disagrees with Follys desire of mental simplicity and fails to find it redemptive. Plato does not associate happiness or tranquility with lifes outer, material surface, but rather along the path to knowledge. Follys actors are strange prisonersno different from us (Plato 241). His use of the word prisoners identifies a limiting force, for example a mental binding, forbidding the experience of knowledge. In Platos account, people living in Follys pretense are tied up in a way which keeps them in one place and allows them to look only straight ahead, but not to turn their heads (240). Folly describes the audiences eye as the most important sense needed in life, while Plato believes that the audiences focus on costumes, or shadows cast by fire on the cave wall, (241) suggests that they live in a material, superficial world. The Allegory of the Cave makes a distinction between a tortured, inferior, material world and an intangible, superior, immaterial world of ide as. Folly maintains that inquisitive men who search for a deeper understanding of the world are disrespecting the greater force of Nature: I believe I hear the philosophers protesting that it can only be misery to live in folly, illusion, deception, ignorance. But it isnt its human. I dont see why they call it a misery when youre all born, formed, and fashioned in this pattern, and its the common lot of mankind (Erasmus 50). She continues with nature as a justification for rejecting Platos ideas. For example, by comparing humans to animals, she argues a need for humans, like animals, to settle on their natural abilities. But a horse who knows nothing of grammar isnt unhappy, and a foolish man is not unfortunate, because this is in keeping with his nature (50). Her argument states that nature gives mankind what it needs to live a happy life. Nature does not give humankind wisdom, and therefore wisdom produces unhappiness. However, Folly contradicts herself when she claims that nature hates any counterfeit and everything turns out much more happily when its unspoiled by artifice (53). Earlier, Folly compares life to a play, or a type of artifice, with no depth underneath the one dimensional surface. These two interpretations of natures wishes confuse her argument. Plato, however, believes that nature blesses humankind with an intricate and complicated world, and people like Folly live in shadows of artifice, which cover up natures requests for the pursuit of knowledge. Platos understanding with nature involves eliminating the shadows and illusions through a process of enlightenment. Platos view of enlightenment involves a reconciliation and understanding with nature, not an opposition. The sight of the prisoners, or actors, represents an imprisoned material world. The firelight corresponds with the light of the sun (Plato 244) which brightens and illumines the world to new areas of study. Moreover, the minds ascent to the intelligible realm eq uals the sight of the things on the surface of the earth (244). Folly uses Platos arguments to advocate how nature purposefully limits understanding. Plato feels that nature forms these dual worlds to increase possibilities for the human condition rather than impose limitations. In addition, people like Folly refuse to appreciate the natural boundlessness of the world and this fetters mankinds natural state away from the light of the sun. Another way in which Folly misconstrues the two accounts relates to their respective views on wisdom and its role in lifes progression: Then follows adolescence, which everyone finds delightfulyouth has so little wisdom and so few frownsas soon as the young grow up and develop the sort of mature sense which comes through experience and education, the bloom of youthful beauty begins to fade at once (then) old age with its troubles, unwelcome to others but just as much to itself (Erasmus 22).Folly explains that in the cycle of life, wisdom ages t he physical body and spirit until it becomes witless in old age before reverting back to a childhood mentality. Her description of these changes brought upon by wisdom upsets a common impression about maturity. Folly equates the acquisition of wisdom with a mental decline into immaturity. The mature children and dying elderly conform to Follys idea of nature. On the other hand, the adult population strays from natures acceptable, limited knowledge into an unfulfilling state like immaturity. But if mortals would henceforth have no truck with wisdomthere would be no more old age and they could be happy enjoying eternal youth (24). While Folly argues about unnecessary wisdom, Plato believes that wisdom is essential. According to Plato, without wisdom, humans never leave their prison cell. People whove traveled there dont want to engage in human business: theres nowhere else their minds would ever rather be than in the upper region (Plato 244). In Platos life journey to wisdo m, man finds fulfillment and substance as he progresses. The children and elderly represent happiness to Folly, yet they are useless to Plato. His allegory admits that life and the pursuit of knowledge involves pain and distress (242) yet the incorporation of wisdom into life transports one to a transcendental universe without material pain. Folly however, cares more about physical comfort through the reduction of pain and the increase in tranquility than mental accomplishment. Plato describes this world of the soul as goodness [] [that] leads one to deduce that it is responsible for everything that is right and fine, whatever the circumstances [] progenitor of light [] source and provider of truth and knowledge (242). Platos understanding of the human world as misery and the divine world as happiness contrasts with Follys understanding of life. Erasmus interpretation of Plato mediates between the two accounts, and he finds reconciliation between the privilege of wisdom and th e assurance of tranquility. Erasmus provides both an ironic and sincere interpretation of Platos Allegory of the Cave. First of all, the ironic outlook on the world occurs in Follys voice, not that of Erasmus: What difference is there, do you think, between those in Platos cave who can marvel at the shadows and images of various objects, provided they are content and dont know what they miss, and the philosopher who has emerged from the cave and sees the real things? (Erasmus 72). In the text, Erasmus means for Follys lecture to be confusing, ridiculous, and at times unjustified. This quote from Folly emphasizes the extent to which Erasmus allows her to misread a text. She admits to the existence of two worlds, the natural and unnatural, yet she ignores their differences. The evidence of contentment contradicts earlier passages where she balances the dual world based on an uneven amount of happiness. In addition, she warns readers that the pursuit of truth leads to the remova l of tranquility. This invites readers to seek out answers and doubt Follys message of truth. But Erasmus also displays a sincere side of Folly as he implements his opinions into her speech: Philosophers [] insist that they alone have wisdom and all other mortals are but fleeting shadows (Erasmus 84). Erasmus struggles with the attitudes of philosophers more than their ideas. He creates Folly as a compromise between conceit and humility. He moves away from the stereotype of the arrogant philosopher. Follys criticism of those philosophers who ignore human business (Plato 244) shows Erasmus concern for an intellectual midpoint which allows the ascent into Platos immaterial realm without the arrogant transition.Finally, Erasmus unifies Folly and Platos accounts of the Allegory of the Cave at the end of the text. Folly is converted from a rejecter of Platonic philosophy into a proponent. Erasmus reconciles the two ideas, pointing out that both Plato and Folly have correct, alth ough different, opinions of the world: The happiness which Christians seek with so many labours is nothing other than a certain kind of madness and folly. Dont be put off by the words, but consider the reality. In the first place, Christians come very near to agreeing with the Platonists that the soul is stifled and bound down by the fetters of the body, which by its gross matter prevents the soul from being able to contemplate and enjoy things as they truly areUndoubtedly this happens because the mind is beginning to free itself from contamination by the body and exercise its true natural power (Erasmus 128).Erasmus advocates the idea of Platonic enlightenment using the example of Christianity as a reason to escape the cave. The childish believer remains stifled and bound. When they question their faith, they develop personal convictions and a stronger argument for their faith. Erasmus, through the voice of Folly, notices that men on their death bed are divinely inspired thro ugh this enlightened realm, a complete change from the earlier belief about the superficial state of dying. This statement accepts Platos view while the next quote accepts Follys view.And so we have a situation which I think is not unlike the one in the myth of PlatoThis man who has gained understanding pities his companions and deplores their insanity, which confines them to such an illusion, but they in their turn laugh at him as if he were crazy and turn him out. In the same way, the common herd of men feels admiration only for the things of the body and believes that these alone exist, whereas the pious scorn whatever concerns the body and are wholly uplifted towards the contemplation of invisible things (Erasmus 129).Folly recognizes that Christianity relies on blind faith and illusions. In Platos cave, man is blind to worldly things and seeks a contemplative life, where he worships intangible ideas. The illusion of Christian belief incorporates Platos view of the divine re alm of knowledge as well as the importance of maintaining Follys illusions.The character Folly represents someone whose eyes become confused in two ways, as a result of two different sets of circumstances: it can happen in the transition from light to darkness, and also in the transition from darkness to light (Plato 244). Folly begins her lecture as a prisoner who will grab hold of anyone who tried to set them freeand kill them (244). This places Folly in the category of relative ignorance according to Plato. Her contradictions and obvious shift in opinion indicates that Folly enters a position on the brink of light. The confusion in her speech is only her adjustment period between ignorance and enlightenment. Therefore, Erasmus Praise of Folly can be read as a similar allegory where Folly begins as a prisoner unable to have intelligent conduct either of ones own private affairs or of public business, (244) and changes to a more enlightened individual as she gradually escapes her cave and adjusts to new vision in the light.Erasmus intends for the readers to challenge Follys statements in his Praise of Folly. He uses Platos Allegory of the Cave as an example of how interpretations vary. Erasmus, above all else, values the idea of questioning others beliefs. Erasmus also demonstrates that in some cases, two separate beliefs can coexist. This applies to the way Sixteenth Century humanists translate ancient texts, like Plato, and find potential danger in their philosophical wisdom. Praise of Folly promotes a message of unification between modern and ancient interpretations of life and wisdom. Works CitedErasmus. Praise of Folly and Letter to Maarten Van Dorp, 1515. Transl. by Betty Radice. London: Penguin Books, 1971.Plato. The Republic. Transl. by Robin Waterfield. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993. 240-45.

Talking about Vacations In English Activity

Talking about vacations in English is of the most common topics in a classroom, and why not? Who doesnt like to take vacations? Discussing vacations provides students with the opportunity to use travel-related vocabulary, as well as a theme that all students enjoy. This conversation lesson provides a survey that students use to choose a dream vacation for their fellow students and is  sure to encourage lots of conversation. Aim Encouraging conversation about vacations to practice travel-related vocabulary. Activity Student survey followed by a choice of dream vacation based on student input. Level Intermediate to advanced Outline Introduce the topic of vacations by telling about one of your favorite vacations.Ask students to come up with different types of vacation activities and write these on the board.If necessary or helpful, review vocabulary about travel.Give each student a vacation survey and have them pair up to interview each other.Once theyve interviewed each other, have students choose a dream vacation for their partner. This exercise can be repeated numerous times with different partners.As a class, ask each student which vacation they chose for their partner and why.  As a follow-up exercise, students can write a short essay by choosing a dream vacation and explaining the choice. Vacation Survey Which sentence best describes your feelings towards vacations? Why? My idea of a good vacation is staying at home.My idea of a good vacation is to visit a number of important cities and explore the culture.My idea of a good vacation is to travel to an exotic beach in a foreign country and then relax for two weeks.My idea of a good vacation is to put on my backpack and disappear into the hills for a few weeks. Which type of travel do you think you would like the best? Why? A long road trip in the car.A twelve-hour flight to a foreign country.A train ride across the country.A luxury cruise through the Mediterranean.   How often do you take short trips (two or three days)? I take a short trip at least once a month.I take short trips a few times a year.I take a short trip once a year.I never take short trips. If you had the chance, would you ... ... take a week trip to an exciting city.... spend a week at a meditation retreat.... visit family that you havent seen for a long time.... go white water rafting for a week. Who do you prefer to take vacations with? Why?   I prefer taking vacations with my close family.I prefer taking vacations with my extended family.I prefer taking vacations by myself.I prefer taking vacations with a good friend. What type of vacation activity sounds like the most fun? Why? Lying on the beachHanging out at a nightclubVisiting a museumSkiing down a mountain   How important is eating well to you when you are on vacation? Its the most important thing!Its important, but not for every meal.A good meal is nice, but not that important.Just give me food, so I can keep going! What type of accommodations do you prefer on vacation?   Id like a luxury suite, please.  Id prefer something close to the beach.I need a clean room, but it should be economical.Id prefer a tent and my sleeping bag.   Dream Vacations Dream Vacation I: Touring the Capitals of Europe: On this two-week vacation, youll visit the capitals of Europe including Vienna, Paris, Milan, Berlin, and London. This inclusive vacation includes tickets to a concert, play or opera in each capital, as well as tours of  castles, national monuments  as well as the most important museums such as The Louvre.​Dream Vacation II: Hanging on the Beach in Hawaii: Two weeks of sun and fun on the beach on Hawaiis dream island of Maui. Youll have a deluxe room at one of Mauis finest hotels directly on the beach. This vacation includes fine dining at some of Mauis best restaurants. During your stay, you can take scuba diving lessons, go snorkeling with thousands of tropical fish, or go whale watching in the bay. Its a dream come true!Dream Vacation III: Hiking the Peruvian Andes: Do you need to get away from it all? If so, this is the vacation for you. Youll be flown into Lima, Peru and taken into the Andes for a two-week backpacking adventure of a lifetime. Weve arranged experienced local guides to accompany you on your journey into the magnificent and mystical landscape.  Dream Vacation IV: New York Party Time!: The Big Apple! Need I say more?! Youll enjoy two weeks stay in a luxury suite in Central Park. Youll need to relax because youll be out enjoying the New York nightlife until early in the morning. This all expenses paid vacation includes dinner at some of the most exclusive restaurants in New York, and on-call car service at any time. Experience New York at its finest and most exciting.

Essay on Analysis of Platos Apology - 1445 Words

The Apology is Platos recollection and interpretation of the Trial of Socrates (399 BC). In this dialogue Socrates explains who he is and what kind of life he led. The Greek word apologia means explanation -- it is not to be confused with apologizing or being sorry for ones actions. The following is an outline of the argument or logos that Socrates used in his defense. A hypertext treatment of this dialogue is also available. I. Prologue (17a-19a) The first sentence sets the tone and direction for the entire dialogue. Socrates, in addressing the men of Athens, states that he almost forgot who he was. The speeches of his accusers had led him to this point. The dialogue will thus be a kind of recollecting by Socrates†¦show more content†¦And no rational person voluntarily harms himself. But if he harmed the youth involuntarily, then he should be instructed (educated) -- not punished. Regarding the Charge of Impiety Socrates next takes up the charge of Impiety. Could a person believe in things like clothes and yet not in human beings who wear them? So too with divine things: Since Socrates believes in a Diamon (a divine thing), it follows that he believes in divinities. IV. Socrates Interpretation of his Art (28b - 32e) Socrates, far from being an impious corruptor of the youth, is actually a blessing sent by the gods. To show this, Socrates likens himself to a GADFLY (a horsefly). Just as a gadfly constantly agitates a horse, preventiung it from becoming sluggish and going to sleep so too Socates, by (moving through the City) stirring up conversations in the marketplace, prevents the City from becoming sulggish and careless and intolerant (thinking it knows something when it doesnt). Ultimately, Socrates whole life had been a service to the City begun out of a pious response to the saying of the gods. This is the deeper refutation of the charges. It is also another positive image of Socrates: He IS a gadfly. V. Socrates Answers the Charges (33a-34b) [Notice the general movement of the defense -- Who Socrates IS NOT: He is NOT a Physicalist; he is NOT a Sophist. Who Socrates IS:Show MoreRelatedPlatos Apology And Crito Analysis1873 Words   |  8 PagesTensions between moral philosopher and the faithful citizen of the polis are highlighted in Plato’s Apology and Crito. In the Apology, Socrates is faced with a death sentence at the hands of the state, but ironically is unapologetic in his discourse while defending himself. The Crito, however, displays Socrates in a dialogue where he chooses to engage and characterize the laws as a means of arguing for his faithfulness to the decision of the polis. Indeed, he uses the laws as a rhetorical deviceRead MoreAnalysis Of Platos Apology On The Man Of Save The Day, But Not Himself1285 Words   |  6 Pagesnot Himself An Analysis of Plato’s Apology Socrates, painted as a humble man who never had any of his own writings, and often speculated to be illiterate, is considered one of the major partisans of Western philosophy. Western philosophy is the philosophical thought of the western world. This idea proves to be quite accurate when considering Plato’s Apology, the apology of Socrates which is not really considered an apology but a defense. In the ancient Greek era, the word apology meant to defendRead MoreThe Presentation of Socrates Arguements in Plato’s Apology and Crito792 Words   |  4 PagesIn both Plato’s Apology and Crito, Plato presents Socrates arguments clearly and precisely. Socrates is wise man with a different perspective on life, which presents us with a mass of contradictions. Socrates is an expressive man, yet he never recorded any works. He is ignorant, but wrongfully convicted who is willing to fight his unjust execution. Behind these dilemmas is an opposition not often explored. Socrate s is the most patriotic of philosophers, who is dedicated to his state. Exploring thisRead MoreBiography of Socrates, An Annotated Bibliography1581 Words   |  6 Pagesinterpretation of human wisdom can be given in terms of â€Å"philosophia†.He confirms his analysis by its resolution of some enduring difficulties in the interpretation of Apology and also by providing the answer as to why Socrates continued to search for knowledge which he thought was impossible to attain. He tries to explain the concept of human wisdom with the help of Socrates sayings. Overall, Dylan provides a clear analysis with the proper tone and style. Kenneth C. Blanchard, Jr. â€Å"The Enemies of Socrates:Read MoreWhat Are The Charges Against Socrates?1019 Words   |  5 PagesPHIL 1301 30 October 2015 What are the charges against Socrates as recorded in the Apology. Is he guilty of them? Why or why not? The Apology is assumed to be the most realistic account that has been conserved of Socrates defense of himself as it was presented before the Athenian Council. It is in essential agreement with the references to the trial that occur in Plato s other dialogs. We may determine that Apology is not written by Socrates and only contains the words of Socrates that were memorizedRead MorePlatos Views on Life after Death1388 Words   |  6 PagesPlatos views on life after death were manifold, and developed over time as an examination of a bevy of his literature readily indicates. However, during all phases of his writing he does demonstrate that there is in fact life after physical death, which is widely attributed to his notion of the soul. Plat always viewed the soul as an entity that was distinct from the physical body. Moreover, while the physical body was destined to die, the soul was enduring, interminable, and destined to go on somewhereRead MoreThe Reconciliation Of Two Positions16 96 Words   |  7 Pagesphilosophy, but the legacy he left behind is something that is still being discussed today by historians and philosophers alike. Socrates is renowned for standing up for his beliefs even in the midst of death as portrayed in Plato’s account of Socrates’ defense speech, Apology, in which he gave during his 339 B.C. trial. It is in this eminent speech that Socrates is able show the dedication he has for philosophy, even going as far as to say that he would rather die than to ever cease practicing philosophyRead MorePlato1819 Words   |  8 PagesSupposed Contradiction in Plato’s Apology and Crito Ben Blanks, Lynchburg College (Editor’s note: This essay by Ben Blanks is the winner of the North Award for the best paper in the 2012 Agora. Ben presented an earlier version of this paper at the ACTC Student Conference at Pepperdine University in Malibu, California, in March, 2011.) When reading the Apology and the Crito of Plato, one inevitably comes upon a seeming fundamental contradiction between the two dialogues. The Apology presents readers withRead MoreCritical Analysis of Plato‚Äà ´s Apology 40c-42a2143 Words   |  9 PagesCritical Analysis of Plato’s Apology 40c-42a Plato’s Apology is one of the most well-known pieces of Plato’s writing today, perhaps due to a certain dramatic style and context that can appeal to any reader. The ‘Apology’ is the defence speech of Socrates before the court at a trial for his life. He has been accused of deliberately corrupting the young and of non-belief in the Athenians’ gods. It is widely accepted that this is a true event, Socrates was tried, found guilty and put to death. WhatRead MoreA Summary On Socrates s Apology1332 Words   |  6 PagesBF299-BR3-BR4 23 March 2016 Socrates’s Attentive Apology The fight to do what is right is not an easy path to traverse, but is one which demands a noble and enduring character. Defending principles of justice with logic and reason in the face of political opposition, is a difficult task to take, but the elusive Socrates boldly undertook this endeavor. In Plato’s Apology, he recalls the daring defence of the principles of truth that Socrates took against all odds. Plato’s recollections, much like the trial of

Project Initiation – Case study

Question: Describe about the Project Initiation Case study. Answer: Introduction: In accordance with the task requirement criteria an attempt shall be considered to address the mentioned tasks of this particular assignment. The major inclusions of this assignment are a brief SWOT analysis based on the information provided in the case scenario, a blueprint of project charter plan and a communication plan relevant to the topic of discussion. SWOT ANALSIS This segment shall perform a brief SWOT analysis in compliance to the details provided in the given case scenario: Strength: The geographical location of the school with respect to its recognition The presence of few number of student in per class as an approach to effectively management the students The inclination towards adapting the applications of information and technology The presence of requisite amount of financial support for incorporation of information and technology setup within the school The positive response of the school administration towards incorporation of inputs fro PWC and co. PWC Weakness: The lack of awareness regarding the operational benefits of information and technology system within the staff members of the school The absence of the required man power to handle the student management related tasks The small operational network of the school with presence of mostly part time teachers Opportunities: The initiatives and support given by the higher administrative segment towards incorporation of information and technology system within the school The presently embedded operational division in the school has eased the development of IT setup The positive approach of the school administration towards incorporation of a IT development plan along with a proper mission and vision The high budget sanctioned by school administration Threat: The increasing pressure of student population The lesser number of staffs and teachers present in the school The absence of proper information technology support system to handle the administrative works and management issues of the school The time duration (only 3 months) that has been allotted for development of information and technology support system within the school Prepare Project Charter Basic details of the project: Project name: IT infrastructure establishment in Willow Brook School, Midwest, United States Email address of the project manager: Project tenure: 3 months Project budget: $80000.00 Project objectives: To embed an effective and stable IT support system within the school in order to ease and fasten the administrative and management works of the school To reduce the pressure of manual handling of school records and also to minimise the occurrence of errors while copying of information from one document to another To aid in effective management of the student records To improve the operational efficiency of the school administration To aid in strengthening the expansion niche of the school Primary deliverables of the project: Installation of internet line and internet connection within the administrative blocks of the school. Installation of computer system with Microsoft Office and PDF converter software Installation of relevant software that aid in checking the errors in the texts (eg: Grammerly software) Installation of Linux operating system and BASIC Installation of Google Chrome and Firefox Mozilla within each system Limitations of the project: The project will not include installation of computer language software namely C+, C++, Java, COBOL, FORTRAN, Pascal, Algol and Prolog Acceptance Criteria of the Project: The delivery of resources particularly the materials required for installation of IT support system within the school is an important criterion related with the project. Apart from this obtaining feedback from PwC regarding the project is another criterion. It is also required to complete the IT support system within the stipulated time before the beginning of the new academic session (Garton McCulloch, 2012). Assumptions and Constraints of project: The primary limitation of this project is mainly the stipulated time period. Additionally availability of adequate space for setting up of the new IT infrastructure can also be a limitation (Wiegers, 2010). Stakeholders List: Executive Director of the school Victoria Ownes, Principal Mrs. Kathy Giliard, Administrative assistant Michelle Madrid, Susan Brown and the other teachers and administrative staff members associated with Willow Brook school of Midwest, United States are the major stakeholders attached with this particular project. Lessons learnt: It is always better to obtain the official permission before beginning of the project related work as to avoid the occurrence of undesired official conflicts. Further it is also a wise decision to specify all the requirements of the project along with an estimate of the expenses for this project for smoothing operation of the project work (Oosthuizen Venter, 2011). Charter Sign off: It is mandatory for every individual who have been enlisted in the stakeholders list to produce their complete signature in the project consent document and other related papers before beginning of the project work. Prepare Communications Plan: One of the primary requirements for initiation of an IT developmental project is formulation of a communication plan that should be relevant and also suffice the key requirements of the project operational activities. Prior presenting the detailed communication plan it is important to have an insight regarding the lateral, downward and upward communication process. The lateral or horizontal communication process reflect information exchange between professionals holding similar ranks with respect to their designation with an organization while downward communication include the practice of information sharing with the lower strata (Jones, 2007). The information sharing process with the higher strata in the professional domain is considered as upward communication plan. For development of this particular project communication plan is very essential and priority has been given towards both upward and downward communication process. The major stakeholders who have been included within t his communication plan are the principal; vice principle the teachers and the administrative staff of the concerned school (Purba Shah, 2000). Furthermore greater emphasis shall be given to convey information regarding the developmental status of the project, details regarding the amount of fund invested and the further official and other requirements of this project. Also the details regarding the purchase of resources have also been considered to be communicated by upward communication process. However providing the required information of how should the implemented IT support system can be useful for the employees has also been included within this particular plan. In context of frequency of communicating with the employees of the school fortnightly meeting with the schools stakeholders has been considered in order share the project status and other issues related with the project (Wiegers, 2010). Face to face communication or through kickoff meetings has been considered as a process of communicating. Project report presentation on monthly basis to the board of directors of the schools is included within the communicatio n plan. Hence the main purpose of communication plan is to deliver updated information regarding the project status to the school administration. However any changes or modifications in project that are require to be discussed with the school administration has also been included within the plan. The school office has been decided as the venue for exchange of project information (Dinsmore Cabanis-Brewin, 2011). Conclusion: In consideration to the information provided in the previous segments of this particular assignment it can be inferred that the task requirements were critically addressed. References: Dinsmore, P. Cabanis-Brewin, J. (2011).The AMA handbook of project management. New York: American Management Association. Garton, C. McCulloch, E. (2012).Fundamentals of Technology Project Management. Chicago: MC Press. Jones, R. (2007).Project management survival. London: Kogan Page. Oosthuizen, T. Venter, R. (2011).Project management in perspective. Southern Africa: Oxford University Press. Purba, S. Shah, B. (2000).How to manage a successful software project. New York: Wiley. Wiegers, K. (2010).Practical Project Initiation. Sebastopol: Microsoft Press.

The role of the Inspector in

The role of the Inspector in- An Inspector Calls Essay Discuss the role of the Inspector in the play. How does Priestley use him? Comment on the way the Inspector varies his treatment of the characters. An Inspector Calls is a play with many social and political messages. J. B. Priestley believed a great deal in socialism and he used several of his plays to try and influence people to be Socialist as well. It was written in a time when Britain was ruled by a Labour government and socialist policies were seen as the way forward. It was a popular way of thinking at that time so Priestleyquot;s aim for the play was probably to teach the unconvinced. We will write a custom essay on The role of the Inspector in- An Inspector Calls specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now The Inspector in J. B. Priestleyquot;s quot;An Inspector Callsquot; is one of the most thought-provoking and mysterious characters that modern day literature has yet produced. It is this mysterious element that contributes greatly to making him a very interesting character and one that may be perceived in many ways. The audience does not find a great deal out about the Inspector and nothing is explicitly told to us; we are given hints and clues from the way he acts and what he says and are forced to piece these together to form our own ideas about his identity and his intentions. In this way, Priestley has asked his audience to act as a judge and to reach personal conclusions about him. The role of the Inspector is one of many levels. In terms of how he is used in the basic structure of the play, he is there to move the play along in that he encourages the characters to tell their stories. If there was not the revelation that he was not a real Police Inspector, he would only be considered as a narrator and not play a big part in the play. Because it transpired that he was an impostor of sorts, further questions are asked by the audience and different insights have become likely and it is clear that the Inspector is in the play for many reasons. The play is set in the house of the Birling family. As soon as the curtains open, it is clear that the family is wealthy because there is high quality furniture and decoration in the house in which the play is set. The family use their house as a status symbol and have decorated it in a way so as to reflect their wealth. We learn this from the quot;few imposing but tasteless picturesquot; which will probably have been chosen because they were expensive, not because they were liked. These pictures also tell us that the Birlings are proud of their wealth and think themselves to be very important but lack the good taste which is present in those who are socially superior to them. The house is described as being quot;substantial and comfortable and old-fashioned, but not cosy and homelike. quot; This setting suggests that the family are uncomfortable with each other and therefore suggests problems. They speak to each other in a fairly relaxed manner, despite the attempts from Mrs. Birling to enforce a more formal atmosphere by correcting her family whenever they make minor errors in table manners. The champagne shows that family are joined to celebrate. Gerald is a guest at the house and so the family are all well-behaved and pleasant to one another but there are several hints that this is for show and there are problems which are being ignored. Mrs. Birling treats Eric and Sheila as if they are two small children even though Sheila is engaged to Gerald and so is a young woman. This is shown when Sheila refers to Eric as quot;squiffyquot; and Mrs. Birling scolds her by saying quot;What and expression, Sheila! Really the things you girls pick up these days! quot; This also shows the difference between the generations; Sheila is younger and so does not act in the same way that her mother thinks women should act. It also suggests that she is reluctant to let her children grow up because once they reach a certain age they would move away and she would live with just her husband, a prospect that she seems unlikely to look forward to. Although the audience is unaware of any problems she and Birling may have, we are given a hint later when she tells Sheila that quot;When youquot;re married youquot;ll realise that men with important work to do sometimes have to spend nearly all their time and energy on their business. Youquot;ll have to get used to that, just as I had. quot; This suggests that their relationship is not very close. Later, Eric says that he sees some of Birlingquot;s quot;respectable friendsquot; with quot;fat old tarts round the townquot;. Birlingquot;s reaction to this is angry and he clearly does not want any further mention of that topic. From this reaction, it is possible to conclude that Birling might also go to prostitutes, as that sort of behaviour was fairly common amongst upper middle-class men at that time. There is a suggestion that Gerald had an affair because Sheila says to him quot;all last summer. you never came near mequot;. There is also a hint at Ericquot;s drinking problem, because even at dinner Sheila notices that he is quot;squiffy. quot; He later acts uneasily when Gerald and his father are joking with him about the possibility of him having quot;been up to somethingquot; and he says that he does not quot;think itquot;s very funny. quot; The audience knows that the joke was harmless and might wonder what Eric has to worry about. As soon as the Inspector enters the stage, the lighting becomes brighter and any shadows would be eliminated. This effect is to show that they can no longer hide and that the Inspector will bring everything to light. This indeed does happen and all of the problems that have been hinted at previously are brought out, plus some others. The war would have been an even sadder issue in 1947 when the play was first shown than it is now, and one which would have made people feel uneasy and would have provoked a lot of emotions and a lot of bad memories. This means that when Birling spoke about it in his speech, the audience would suspect that the play was about to become darker because such a distressing topic would not be mentioned if something bad was not going to happen. This is an example of dramatic irony because the play was written in 1947 so the audience knew that there were two world wars about to happen, but the characters did not. The Inspector seems to already know of the incidents that the family tell him. When Eric and Sheila find out what their parents and Gerald contributed to the demise of Eva, they are shocked: quot;Well I think itquot;s a damn shame. quot; The Inspector reacts quite contrarily to this and stays perfectly calm and shows no surprise at what is being said which suggests that he is waiting for their confessions. Sheila notices this and says quot;We hardly ever told him anything he didnquot;t know. quot; The characters cannot hide the truth from the Inspector because he appears to know it already. In this way, he is similar to a conscience. An Inspector investing a crime would want to find out all he could and look for evidence and so forth, but the Birlings have not committed a crime punishable by law. Therefore, the only way for the Inspector to avenge Eva Smith was to make the people in question feel guilty. The Birling parents will not accept any blame and just try to justify what they have done by saying quot;The girl had been causing trouble in the works,quot; and quot;it wasnquot;t I who had turned her out of her employment which probably began it all. quot; Eric and Sheila, however, show a lot of remorse and are quick to take responsibility for their actions; Sheila admits that she had no excuse for doing what she did, she was just quot;in a bad temper. quot; This to show that there is hope for the future and that ideas are changing; the younger generation are more supportive of Socialism and the idea of helping others and not just thinking of oneself. Priestley uses the play as an example of what can happen if we are ignorant to the feelings of others as this was an issue that he cared a lot about and one that recurred in several of his other plays. Just before the Inspector leaves he turns the blame onto the whole of society by mentioning that the problem did not lie with just Eva Smith and one particular family, but it was the quot;millions and millions and millions of Eva Smiths and John Smiths still left with us intertwined with our lives. quot; This was said near to the end so that it would not be an idea forgotten, but one that might play on the minds of the audience long after they left the theatre. Priestley intended to make his audience think about how they may be hurting people and to make them feel guilty for what they may have done in the past and the Inspector is a useful medium for Priestleyquot;s beliefs to be spoken through. The Inspector is described as speaking quot;carefully, weightilyquot;. On stage, this would give the Inspector an air of power and importance. He acts in a fairly dominant way and he often has times when he gives Arthur Birling no respect at all, such as when he says quot;Donquot;t stammer and yammer at me again, man. quot; Because the Inspector treats Arthur in this way even though he knows he is quot;still on the Benchquot; it implies that he treats people the same no matter what their position is. Birling often seems intimidated by the Inspector and often accepts the disrespect he is given even though it would annoy him because he is very used to being given respect as he was quot;an alderman for years and a Lord Mayor two years ago. quot; Becau se Birling does not know what to do when he is treated in this way, it suggests that he is a weak person. .ue170b34113f6204a8fe1775ca3196e82 , .ue170b34113f6204a8fe1775ca3196e82 .postImageUrl , .ue170b34113f6204a8fe1775ca3196e82 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .ue170b34113f6204a8fe1775ca3196e82 , .ue170b34113f6204a8fe1775ca3196e82:hover , .ue170b34113f6204a8fe1775ca3196e82:visited , .ue170b34113f6204a8fe1775ca3196e82:active { border:0!important; } .ue170b34113f6204a8fe1775ca3196e82 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .ue170b34113f6204a8fe1775ca3196e82 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .ue170b34113f6204a8fe1775ca3196e82:active , .ue170b34113f6204a8fe1775ca3196e82:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .ue170b34113f6204a8fe1775ca3196e82 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .ue170b34113f6204a8fe1775ca3196e82 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .ue170b34113f6204a8fe1775ca3196e82 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .ue170b34113f6204a8fe1775ca3196e82 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .ue170b34113f6204a8fe1775ca3196e82:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .ue170b34113f6204a8fe1775ca3196e82 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .ue170b34113f6204a8fe1775ca3196e82 .ue170b34113f6204a8fe1775ca3196e82-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .ue170b34113f6204a8fe1775ca3196e82:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Comparision of dicvised peice and another sun EssayIt is ironic that a character who believes very strongly that one should only be responsible for oneself is also a character who does not seem to be able to fend for himself. The Inspector questions Birling about why he fired the girl for asking for more money. This shows further lack of respect from the Inspector and also shows that he cares about individuals. Birling was quot;surprisedquot; at being questioned, so it seems that what he says is usually accepted as correct. His surprise could also be because of exactly what the Inspector was questioning. Birling says that it is his quot;duty to keep labour costs downquot; which indicates that he does not think of each worker as a person and cares a great deal about money. The fact that he did not recognise the name Eva Smith even though she was someone he dealt with directly and a worker who stood out, further shows that he does not think of his employees as people. To him they are nameless and have no individuality. This would make a lot of the audience angry as this is a very Capitalist view. Some of the audience might also feel an affinity with Eva in that they may have also been treated in a similar manner. The Inspector pretends to share Birlingquot;s attitudes to class by saying quot;like a lot of these young women who get into various kinds of trouble. quot; This encourages Birling to talk to him because he sees him as somebody who will not oppose him. This implies that the Inspector knows how Birling thinks even though he has apparently only known him for a short while. The Inspector recognises early on that Sheila is more morally sound than her father as she points out that quot;these girls arenquot;t cheap labour theyquot;re people. quot; When she says quot;So Iquot;m really responsible? quot; she shows that she can admit when she is wrong. The Inspector probably thinks more highly of her than Arthur because of this, but he still speaks quot;sternlyquot; to her as he does to the other characters. This proves that he does not forgive easily. Once the line of questioning turns to Gerald, the Inspector is more friendly to Sheila. He understands that she would want to hear about Geraldquot;s affair with Eva Smith and ensures that she stays by arguing that if she left then and heard no more she would quot;feel shequot;s entirely to blame. quot; At first, when the Inspector refuses to show Gerald the photograph of the girl, Gerald is quot;showing annoyance. quot; He tries to be authoritative towards the Inspector, possibly to impress his future wife and in-laws. The Inspector will not be ordered to do anything. For example, when Gerald tells the Inspector that hequot;s quot;Getting a bit heavy-handed,quot; the Inspector calmly dismisses his comment by saying quot;Possibly. But if youquot;re easy with me, Iquot;m easy with you. quot; When Gerald tells his story, he is questioned mainly by Sheila who is angry with Gerald for betraying her. The Inspector treats Gerald with neither fondness nor contempt. He observes that quot;he at least had some affection for her and made her happy for a time. quot; Mrs. Birling is not present for the majority of the questioning, so she is unfamiliar to the Inspectorquot;s abruptness. She describes him as quot;a trifle impertinentquot;. She, like Arthur Birling, seems to be used to receiving nothing but respect. This is because she is of a high-middle class. The Inspector treats the characters with the same disregard as they gave Eva Smith. Mrs. Birling becomes increasingly annoyed at how the Inspector treats her. This is shown when the Inspector says, quot;Youquot;re not telling me the truthquot;, and she replies quot;I beg your pardon! quot; She seems horrified by the way she reacts that somebody could speak in that way to a lady of her class. Like her husband, Mrs. Birling refuses to accept any responsibility for the death of Eva Smith. Protective of her family, she does not criticise any of them either, but turns all of the blame onto the unidentified man: the father of Evaquot;s child. She very happily says that the man should be quot;dealt with very severelyquot; and made to quot;confess in public his responsibility,quot; oblivious to what most of the audience would have realised; that Eric was the father. This is another example of irony. She believes that the man must be someone who is working-class and has not been brought up properly because he was a drunk and guilty of theft. Eric seems to see the Inspector as the strong father figure that is missing from his life. He said that Birling was quot;not the kind of father a chap could go to when hequot;s in troublequot; so he is obviously not close to him. When his father talks about his quot;public school and Varsity lifequot;, Eric seems embarrassed and says to Birling quot;Well, we donquot;t need to tell the Inspector anything about that, do we? quot; Eric is just as quick as Sheila to give the Socialist alternatives to what Birling was saying about the workers, and tells him that he would quot;have let her stay. quot; Eric is slow in telling his story and he only answers the questions that he is asked and he only gives away a little information at a time. This shows that he is reluctant for the others to know about his problems. The Inspector is fairly gentle when he questions Eric because he is clearly very upset and guilt-ridden. The Inspector notices this even though Birling does not and when he asks for a drink, he allows him one with the explanation that quot;He needs a drink now just to see him through. quot; The Birling parents represent the older people who follow the dated Edwardian ideas. Arthur Birling is a rich businessman who thinks very highly of himself, even though he is often wrong. Arthurquot;s family respect him and listen intently to his ideas that quot;there isnquot;t a chance of warquot; and the Titanic is quot;unsinkable. quot; As the play was written in 1947 and set in 1912, this is an example of dramatic irony and the audience would know that Arthur was very wrong in his opinions and might even think him to be stupid. When he says quot;the way some of these cranks talk and write now, youquot;d think everybody has to look after everybody elsequot;, he explicitly says that he is strongly Capitalist and is narrow minded. Priestley wanted the audience to have a low opinion of Birling because he was discouraging his Capitalist politics and trying to show people like Birling to be at fault. Each of the Birlings and Gerald have done things to Eva that were wrong. However, Sheila and Eric are very regretful and seem to have learnt from their mistakes and immediately become more likeable and seem less at fault. The Inspector implies that the Birling parents and Gerald Croft are the ones more at fault because their Edwardian ideas about class and Capitalism do not change. Priestley and the Inspector think that quot;Public men have responsibilities as well as privilegesquot; which suggests that Priestley thinks that those who forget their responsibilities also cause social problems. Mrs. Birling makes more references to class than Birling. It is possible that Arthur is slightly embarrassed by the fact that his wife is his quot;social superior. quot; This is apparent near the beginning of the play when Birling compliments his own meal and Mrs. Birling tells him that he is quot;not supposed to say such things. quot; The Inspector says in his final speech quot;We are responsible for each other. if men will not learn that lesson, then they will be taught in fire and blood and anguish. quot; This is an implication that he is criticising those who do not learn, not those who have acted that way in the past. Therefore, Priestley and the Inspector think that the people at fault are those that employ and hold on to thoughts that one should think only of oneself. After the Inspector leaves, the characters begin to speculate whether or not he was a real Police Inspector. Each of them believe his manner to have been inappropriate. Birling points out fairly early on in the play that he is quot;officiousquot;, but the audience are unlikely to actually strongly question his identity simply because they are not given time to because the action is constant throughout the play, with many twists and revelations. Although the audience and the characters realise towards the end of the play that he definitely was not a real Police Inspector, Priestley does not explain who or what he was. .u158742f00ebc65e7ddde2cd49ba0dd65 , .u158742f00ebc65e7ddde2cd49ba0dd65 .postImageUrl , .u158742f00ebc65e7ddde2cd49ba0dd65 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u158742f00ebc65e7ddde2cd49ba0dd65 , .u158742f00ebc65e7ddde2cd49ba0dd65:hover , .u158742f00ebc65e7ddde2cd49ba0dd65:visited , .u158742f00ebc65e7ddde2cd49ba0dd65:active { border:0!important; } .u158742f00ebc65e7ddde2cd49ba0dd65 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u158742f00ebc65e7ddde2cd49ba0dd65 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u158742f00ebc65e7ddde2cd49ba0dd65:active , .u158742f00ebc65e7ddde2cd49ba0dd65:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u158742f00ebc65e7ddde2cd49ba0dd65 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u158742f00ebc65e7ddde2cd49ba0dd65 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u158742f00ebc65e7ddde2cd49ba0dd65 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u158742f00ebc65e7ddde2cd49ba0dd65 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u158742f00ebc65e7ddde2cd49ba0dd65:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u158742f00ebc65e7ddde2cd49ba0dd65 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u158742f00ebc65e7ddde2cd49ba0dd65 .u158742f00ebc65e7ddde2cd49ba0dd65-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u158742f00ebc65e7ddde2cd49ba0dd65:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Brave New World And 1984 EssayEven the most observant of watchers or readers is likely to find no clues as to what the Inspector could have been, so Priestleyquot;s aim was to leave this matter a complete mystery. This tactic could have been to ensure that his viewers continued to think about the story and hence would also have to think about the issues of Socialism and this is something which he was desperate to do. Although nobody could ever know for sure what the Inspector was, there have been many theories. One is that he had travelled from the future to avenge Eva Smith. People may have thought this because the Inspector knew before it happened that the girl would drink disinfectant and kill herself. The Inspector does get justice for Eva in a way because he makes the family feel worse than any real Inspector could. The Inspector called himself quot;Goole,quot; which could be a pun on the word quot;ghoulquot; which is defined as quot;a person interested in morbid or disgusting things. quot; This could be considered true of the Inspector if he was indeed a person from another time who investigated different peoplesquot; deaths. In terms of Priestley conveying his message that we are quot;members of one bodyquot;, it is unimportant whether or not the Inspector was real nor if there was one girl or several girls. That is likely to be clear to those who watch the play as they will realise that the important issue is that the family and society has been told what could happen when they disregard the need to think of others, but some of the characters in the play forget what they have been taught because the Inspector was not real and they are not going to be involved in a public scandal. Because the Birling parents and Gerald end the play as oblivious to the needs of others as they began it, they are shown to be small-minded. It is only Sheila and Eric who learn from their experience and realise that him not being an Inspector changes nothing because the quot;girlquot;s still deadquot;. When Sheila says quot;he inspected us all rightquot; she shows maturity which is not reflected in her parents. I think the mystery surrounding the Inspector makes a big difference to the story because it gives it a distinguishing feature that would have been missing if this twist was not included. The play is written in a style whereby there are twists and revelations whenever the story gets comfortable for the watcher; Priestley wants there to be changes in the pace of the play and in the story so that the audiencequot;s concentration will not decline. This could happen because there are no changes to the setting of the play and there are not many characters or subplots. Priestley may have also included the twist because makes the tale more interesting and this would encourage more people to go and watch it. By leaving questions unanswered, Priestley is inviting his audience to think about the play. Because the Inspector was not real does not make any difference to the guilt that the characters and society as a whole should be feeling at the end of the play. People who watch the play should still learn a lesson from it. We expect all of the characters to admit to their faults and to learn from what the Inspector teaches them because we have been conditioned to look for the well-worn formula whereby bad characters convert to good characters because a third character has helped them to recognise their flaws. This formula is most recognisable in Charles Dickensquot; A Christmas Carol. Surprisingly, this is not the case in An Inspector Calls. After the Inspector is found to have been a fake, the Birling parents and Gerald remain unaffected by the nightquot;s events. Sheila points out that Birling doesnquot;t quot;seem to have learnt anything. quot; Once they realise that there will be quot;no scandalquot; They try to turn a blind eye to the problems that have been identified. They ignore Ericquot;s drinking problem and make little further mention of the fact that he stole a great deal of money from the family business. They ignore these problems because they are only interested in how they will look to other people. If nobody knows about their problems, they need not address them. This is proven when Birling says that there is a quot;difference between a lot of stuff like this coming out in private and a downright public scandal. quot; When Birling says to Sheila quot;youquot;d better ask Gerald for that ring you gave back to himquot;, he again shows that he is happy to forget what has happened because he is ignoring the fact that Gerald had still had an affair with another woman whilst he was in a strong relationship with Sheila. Mrs. Birling makes several comments to prove that she agrees with her husband, such as saying that once her children had slept off their tiredness quot;theyquot;ll be as amused as we are. quot; Gerald is just as bad as Mr. and Mrs. Birling because he says quot;Everythingquot;s all right nowquot; which proves that he believes that the Inspector not being real negates the fact that he has been unfaithful. Sheila proves herself intelligent throughout the play. She is quick to notice that the Inspector knows an awful lot about the family. We know that she notices his great knowledge because just after she is questioned about how she lost the girl her job at Milwards, she says: quot;I hate to think how much he knows that we donquot;t know yet. quot; She has changed her attitude about how to treat people and is disgusted that her parents have not done the same: quot;itquot;s you two who are being childish trying not to face the facts. quot; Eric behaves much the same as Sheila. He seems to have respect for her because he does not directly argue with his parents about the way they are acting but instead supports Sheila in what she says by saying quot;Sheilaquot;s right,quot; and quot;I agree with Sheila. quot; He and Sheila are both there to give us hope for the future; the younger generation have better attitudes and can improve society. As the Inspector said, children are quot;more impressionable. quot; The Inspector leaves the family and the audience feeling awkward because he uses a lot of emotive language such as nd he speaks with real passion. In this speech he, and therefore Priestley, try to make people understand just how serious problems can get when we do not realise that quot;We are responsible for each other. quot; This speech gives an opposite message to that which Birling gave whereby he said that quot;a man has to mind his own business and look after himself and his own. quot; It was at that point where the Inspector entered, as if to prove him wrong. In his speech, the Inspector makes reference to the forthcoming war with the idea that if people do not learn that quot;We are members of one body. then they will be taught in fire and blood and anguish. quot; This is a very powerful statement and it would seem that the Inspector is implying that the war was sent to punish people for not working together, and at the same time forcing them to do so. The war did break down barriers between classes and people had to all work for the country, not for personal gain, so what the Inspector spoke of was accurate. I think Priestley used the idea of war to convey his message because it was a major issue when the play was written and everyone would have suffered from it and would care greatly about it. The play finishes with a telephone call from the police saying that quot;A girl has just died. after swallowing some disinfectantquot; and a real Inspector will question the family. This is an unexpected twist. The fake Inspector was there to punish them on a moral level and to try and make them feel guilty enough to change their behaviour. This was accomplished with Eric and Sheila, but not with the others. The only thing that they would be affected by was a quot;public scandal,quot; and the real Inspector would ensure that that is what they would get. Without this twist, it would seem that the Birling parents and Gerald would escape unpunished. One must conclude that the Inspectorquot;s main purpose is to teach. In the context of the play, he told the characters what had happened to a particular girl because they had each been guilty of selfishness. In regards to the whole of society, he voiced Priestleyquot;s opinions that we cannot make any progress if we do not work together. In my opinion, those watching or reading the play today would not gain as much from the story in regards to the moral teachings because most have now accepted the advantages of Socialism over Capitalism and so do not have as much to learn on the arguments of this issue as the audiences of 1947. In regards to the question of what the Inspector actually was, I personally feel that there is not enough evidence given for even a strong, fact-supported theory to be produced to answer the question, let alone an infallible answer.

Strong Arts, Strong Schools essays

Strong Arts, Strong Schools essays After reading the two articles by Charles Fowler, I learned the importance of enforcing art into students education. Fowler suggested many concepts regarding arts in school life. Art is a necessity in students learning and development. In addition, if we can find the intelligences described by Howard Gardners article in each child, together with art in their lessons, it will be the best way a child can learn. According to the article, Strong Arts, Strong Schools, Fowler discussed how arts have a great influence in school. He believes The best schools have the best arts programs. In his article, Fowler gave an example of students studying the Grand Canyon. Instead of explaining every little details of the Grand Canyon, through looking at the picture or painting of the Grand Canyon, students will be able to see visually what it look like. However, one cannot really see everything just by looking at a picture, such as the measurement of the Grand Canon. Therefore, we also need to incorporate math and science into it. I completely agree with Fowler that a multiplicity of symbol systems are required to provide a more complete picture and a more comprehensive education. Fowler reasons that The arts teach divergent rather than convergent thinking. That means students can come up with their own correct response because there may be many correct answers in the real world. Through arts, students use hands on to experience and create their own inventions. From these inventions, each individual student had developed his/her own critical thinking and analysis skills. In addition, craftsmanship is also involved in the students inventions process. When one get involve into an art project, he/she will need to apply all the important details into it. He will try to do his best in making it perfect by using his judgment to self-correct. I believe art is a great motiv...

Renewable energy law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Renewable energy law - Essay Example There are several reasons why the government should insist on the usage of renewable energy sources. Renewable energy sources are no likely to cause pollution in the air and on water bodies.However,there are some sources of renewable energy that can cause environmental degradation if not carefully used; such sources include large hydro and some kinds of biomass. Renewable energy is also seen as a perfect example in fighting global warming. These sources of energy do not emit carbon monoxide into the air thus affecting the ozone layer. Further, renewable sources of energy are sustainable; they can be used for several years without being depleted. Renewable sources of energy such as hydro, solar, geothermal, wind, tidal and wave power have got no fuel costs: their production does not depend on the presence of fuel for their production. Their usage can prevent the ever rising prices of energy.The UK and Canada have got the powers to declare an executive economic zone (EEZ).Such a resolu tion means that they are able to establish any organization that will be mandated and concerned with the production of renewable energy. They will also be able to produce renewable energy through the water, current and winds. The UK has got no intention to declare an EEZ, however, the government will consider the move once it receives royal assent from the United Nations. Precedent to this policy is witnessed in the country’s commissioning of an Executive Fishing Zone and another zone for the conservation of the marine environment. These two policies progress the UK’s ability in respect to specific rights, those that exist outside its territorial waters (Roggenkamp and Hammer, 2004). Privileges established in the primary legislation will assist in the creation of boundaries to the production of renewable energy which is expected to operate under the Orders in Council. Regulation for this can be found in the secondary regulation under section 1 (7) of the continental sh elf act 1967 which is concerned with the mapping of the UK’s continental shelf. The government projects that the renewable energy zone will also work in the same way as the UK continental shelf. There are also some limits to these regulations, it is evident that they will challenged by other regulations from other coastal states, for example, at the west coast of Scotland, the limit may extend to over 200 mile limit (Roggenkamp and Hammer, 2004). The UK government has got plans to allocate resources necessary for the development of renewable energy zones, especially in the Crown state. To ensure that the offshore renewable energy installations meet the standards of the UK government, policy makers in the sector will have follow the similar approach followed in the Petroleum Act 1998 (Roggenkamp and Hammer, 2004). This will be achieved through the use of Orders in Council to ensure strict application of the necessary law of England, Wales and Scotland to the approach towards r enewable energy investments and any acts or omissions committed with the range of 500 meters. Further, the government plans to use the protection enjoyed in the Submarine Telegraph act 1885 in the submarine cable responsible for the installation of renewable energy devices, either in the territorial sea or in its internal waters. To this far, the work of the legal team in the provision of regulations within the renewable energy sector will be put to practice by using relevant provisions of the legislation which are already being used in its territorial waters. The government also holds the view that offshore renewable energy and their relation with the integrated transmission network should honor the same quality and safety as the onshore installations. Policy makers therefore plan to extend the legality of the sections 29 and 30 of the electricity act to the renewable energy zone. Further, due to the potentiality of disaster that offshore renewable energy may pose to the airplanes, they plan to also use the civil aviation authority so as to

Organisation and Management Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Organisation and Management - Essay Example The goals would be looked from the eyes of the person whose interest lies in the implied strategy. There may arise some biasness in terms of tasks being done. The information here needs to be gathered by the expert professionals to ensure that it is accurate and according to the modern technologies. Once the information is gathered it is normally communicated through a one-way process, either through senior or expert representatives to the recipients. Communication is done on the basis of understanding and not redefining of what the experts had gathered. The actual gatherings of data must be discussed thoroughly to avoid the self-interests of some of the employees. Normative-Reeducative in this kind of a change people are more focused on things that satisfies and fulfill their needs. Over here the issue is not to find the right information but to find an effective relationship between the values of the employees and the organization on whole. In this the organization tries to involve as many employees as they can to get an overall picture of the needs and values that the employees crave for. Intense interactions between the employees are required. For the change strategy to be successful the organization has to take into consideration the surrounding culture like broader system, habits and values of the employees that dominate. ... This process takes a longer period of time as compared to empirical rational. In such a change if the organization goes by the values and culture of a specific culture then they may find difficult competing with the international world if the global culture does not contain the same values and needs. Power-Coercive in this kind of a change those who possess knowledge hold the power. This approach focuses more on the use of political and economic sanctions as the main strategy to bring about change. Political power normally involves policies, laws and other agreements, and economic on the other hand is the logical extension of political power. Here the issues focus on jail and other personal liberty sanctions. Some of the specific strategies that come under this approach may include over throw of political regimes or changing of organizational management through stakeholder pressure and so on. This kind of a strategy maybe de-motivating for some employees to work. Today employees want empowerment and job rotation in order to increase the interest in their work schedules, but working under such authoritative strategy may affect their output. The authority imposing employees may show biasness to some of the other employees causing differences. Environmental-Adaptive People are not happy with the disruptions that occur within the organization but they do adapt to new circumstances as required. It is more like building a new organization and gradually transferring people from the old one to the new one. Not all organizations are willing to change when the need arises. They are more scared of what if the changes do not suit the organization over all, and therefore they continue with the orthodox ways of achieving goals where as the

Natural world threatening Essay Example for Free

Natural world threatening Essay On the whole, Plath finds the natural world threatening. ’ In the light of this statement, compare the ways in which Plath and Hughes write about the natural world. You must include in your response detailed reference to ‘The Moon and the Yew Tree’ and to at least one other poem. ’ The natural world often seems to reflect the writer’s mood vividly and traditionally, nature is used to convey emotions. Plath uses nature to express her interior misery by comparing aspects of nature with her own emotions to show how she is alone, isolated and emotionally cold; this is particularly visible in both ‘The Moon and the Yew Tree’ and ‘Elm’. In contrast to Hughes, who finds the natural world fascinating as seen in ‘Hawk Roosting. ’ In The Moon and the Yew Tree, Plath focuses on two features of landscape, which are used to establish the mood. The poem quickly becomes a bleak statement of nothingness and despair, whereby she projects her feelings onto the moon and onto the yew tree. Throughout the poem, her gaze remains fixed on the moon, an image which Plath finds threatening since the light it gives off is ‘cold and planetary’ an unsettling image with Plath does not find particularly comforting, since she is describing the moon as emotionally cold. The moon seems to have its own troubles with it being ‘terribly upset’ here Plath uses the moon to express her own feelings of sadness, although the moon conveys her own despair, she describes the moon as having despair a reason why she ‘live[s] here’ –inside the moon, in her world of despair. The personification of the moon has made it a female character traditionally for Plath a symbol of barren coldness; hence Plath finds the natural world threatening by the negative power of the moon. The Yew Tree also lies at the heart of the poem, it is immediately associated with overwhelmingly negativity ‘the trees of the mind are black’. Plath uses pathetic fallacy giving emotions to inanimate objects throughout the poem, creating a tense, threatening atmosphere. In contrast to Plath who finds the natural world threatening, Hughes writes about the power of nature and how immense it is. Yet Hughes uses the power of creation to highlight the evil in nature, which is highlighted by the God like powers of the hawk, where the bird’s arrogance and self-importance is emphasised sitting ‘in the top of everything’. Metaphoric images underline the hawk’s opinion of its own superiority ‘Now I hold creation in my foot’ exemplifying the God-like power of the hawk. The hawk is like a prehistoric monster ‘nothing has changed since I began’ it is something that other creatures need to fear and that underlines the sense of its own power. Hughes finds nature threatening within the poem by the evil within the hawk – it is a killing machine, everything about it is geared to ‘the allotment of death’. Ultimately, what Hughes presents is an accumulation of onomatopoeic and metaphoric images that may cause the reader to fear the bird, which finally may persuade the reader to see nothing other than an immense specimen of nature. Similar to Plath who in ‘Elm’ writes the poem from the Elms perspective, Hughes adopts the persona of a hawk, effectively showing us the world from the birds prospective. However in contrast to Plath who uses Elm to show an image of femininity, Hughes uses the masculine hawk as a very powerful image, who is threatening because of the evil things it does.

Essay --

In 1973, Congress passed the Endangered Species Act (ESA) that expressed concern that many species were in danger of becoming extinct. These native plants/ animals are on the verge of disappearing forever...this act needs to save them. This act will protect and help species at risk of extinction recover. By promoting policies nationwide to help species recover that are native to the U.S., this act enforced by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the Commerce Department’s National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), will help make these goals possible. In order to ensure that this is possible, the ESA contains sections that encourage States to maintain conservation programs for these species at risk. There are safe harbor agreements, candidate conservation agreements, and conservation banks that are in effect in sake of these threatened/ endangered species ("Endangered Species Act"). IUCN REDLIST The main goal of the Red List is to motivate the global community to help protect species from going extinct, while we can still make a change. †ªSome plans are to improve fisheries management, monitor and minimize effects of human disturbance in breeding areas, and provide nest boxes in predator-free areas in order to help monitor reproductive success for the penguins (Red List).†¬ The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species is different each time due to the fact that the update changes the numbers of species listed in each category. Some reasons for this cause is because of various factors, including new species being added to the Red List, species being reassessed and moved into a different category of threat, and taxonomic revisions, which can change the total population of species within a group (Red List). IUCN has more than 1,... ...redible cultural asset to their land. Therefore, the Galapagos penguins are valuable, and need to be preserved. 1. Personally, a loss of any creature is a sad topic to discuss, especially an extinction. Our hopes are that this species does not go extinct in the near future. There are only 2000 of them left. There are wildlife efforts to save these galapagos penguins that must remain a necessity. By donating  £25 to the Galapagos Conservation Trust, you can adopt a Galà ¡pagos penguin. This adoption program is a UK registered charity working for the conservation needs of the Galà ¡pagos Islands (Galapagos Conservation Trust). It would be a disappointment if the last Galapagos penguin dies before any children can view them. It will be an amazing accomplishment if this species is preserved and taken off the Endangered Species List. Let's stay on the road to recovery! Essay -- In 1973, Congress passed the Endangered Species Act (ESA) that expressed concern that many species were in danger of becoming extinct. These native plants/ animals are on the verge of disappearing forever...this act needs to save them. This act will protect and help species at risk of extinction recover. By promoting policies nationwide to help species recover that are native to the U.S., this act enforced by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the Commerce Department’s National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), will help make these goals possible. In order to ensure that this is possible, the ESA contains sections that encourage States to maintain conservation programs for these species at risk. There are safe harbor agreements, candidate conservation agreements, and conservation banks that are in effect in sake of these threatened/ endangered species ("Endangered Species Act"). IUCN REDLIST The main goal of the Red List is to motivate the global community to help protect species from going extinct, while we can still make a change. †ªSome plans are to improve fisheries management, monitor and minimize effects of human disturbance in breeding areas, and provide nest boxes in predator-free areas in order to help monitor reproductive success for the penguins (Red List).†¬ The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species is different each time due to the fact that the update changes the numbers of species listed in each category. Some reasons for this cause is because of various factors, including new species being added to the Red List, species being reassessed and moved into a different category of threat, and taxonomic revisions, which can change the total population of species within a group (Red List). IUCN has more than 1,... ...redible cultural asset to their land. Therefore, the Galapagos penguins are valuable, and need to be preserved. 1. Personally, a loss of any creature is a sad topic to discuss, especially an extinction. Our hopes are that this species does not go extinct in the near future. There are only 2000 of them left. There are wildlife efforts to save these galapagos penguins that must remain a necessity. By donating  £25 to the Galapagos Conservation Trust, you can adopt a Galà ¡pagos penguin. This adoption program is a UK registered charity working for the conservation needs of the Galà ¡pagos Islands (Galapagos Conservation Trust). It would be a disappointment if the last Galapagos penguin dies before any children can view them. It will be an amazing accomplishment if this species is preserved and taken off the Endangered Species List. Let's stay on the road to recovery!