Euthyphros Definition Of Piety

Euthyphros Definition Of Piety In Platos Euthyphro, the character Euthyphro endeavors to characterize the devout as what all the divine beings love. In this exposition, I will analyze the premise on which Socrates dismisses this definition. So as to do as such, I will give a diagram of the discourse for setting. Besides, I will examine what Socrates appears to require for a decent definition. At last, I will endeavor to safeguard Euthyphros definition. Socrates rejects Euthyphros definition in light of the fact that his thinking is round, yet I will contend that by expelling the certain prerequisite that there should be a reason for what the divine beings love, Euthyphros definition faces Socrates contention while falling under his necessities for a decent definition. In the Euthyphro, Socrates needs Euthyphro to teach him on meaning of the devout, as Euthyphro is viewed as an expert on every single strict issue, and Socrates accepts that by going under his tutelage he can escape Meletus charges should he indict Socrates. Socrates and Euthyphro concur that there must be one careful norm or trademark quality by which every devout thing are devout and everything offensive, as opposed to the devout, is reprobate. Socrates needs to comprehend what this quality is. Euthyphro recommends that indicting the individuals who submit shameful acts is devout, and not arraigning them is offensive, paying little mind to whom they might be. He references his arraignment of his own dad for homicide for instance. He takes note of that Zeus detained his own dad for underhandedly eating up his own youngsters. As Zeus is the best and generally just of the considerable number of divine beings (6a), in the event that he carries on appropriately in detaining his dad for bad form, Euthyphros activities must be devout for following this model. Socrates feels this is definitely not a decent meaning of devotion. He calls attention to indicting the individuals who submit shameful acts is only a case of a devout demonstration, and not a meaning of devotion itself. Euthyphro surrenders that there are a lot increasingly devout deeds that don't comprise of arraigning wrongdoers. Socrates at that point asks Euthyphro to disclose to him the basic viewpoint, by which every heavenly demonstration are sacred (6d). Euthyphro then proposes another definition: that devotion is what is pleasant to the divine beings. Socrates continues to examine whether this progressively broad definition is precise. Initially, he notes out that the divine beings themselves regularly fight, as is described in the legends that Euthyphro puts stock in so actually. Socrates calls attention to that contentions don't persevere over contested realities, since understandings can be reached through figuring or examination, but instead over inquiries of significant worth, for example, what is good and bad, and respectable and disreputable, and great and terrible (7d). Euthyphro concurs with this appraisal. Socrates calls attention to that on the off chance that the divine beings squabble about what is simply and what is acceptable, at that point there is unmistakably no understanding among them on such issues. All things considered, in the event that they have various sentiments on equity, it follows that they should affirm of various things. In this manner there must be sure things that are adored by certain divine beings and disliked by different divine beings. In any case, as per Euthyphros definition, that would imply that those things are both devout and scandalous, since they are endorsed of by certain divine beings and opposed by others. This is obviously opposing to the prior attestation that there is one standard for devotion, and concordantly for profanity since the iconoclastic is what isn't devout. Euthyphro answers that without a doubt the divine beings all concur that an individual who murders somebody unfairly ought to be rebuffed. Socrates answers that the contention isn't about whether a recognized miscreant ought to be rebuffed, yet about whether that individual has in actuality acted unreasonably. Consequently for Euthyphros contention to have any weight, he needs not to show that the divine beings concur that somebody who kills shamefully ought to be rebuffed, yet that they concur that a specific homicide is crooked in any case. The entirety of this gives us a thought regarding what Socrates thinks about a decent definition. He isn't happy with answers that relate to particular sorts of devotion, or explicit instances of devotion. The appropriate response must concern a quality that includes all types of devotion and to nothing that isn't devout. To put it plainly, a decent definition, for Socrates, requires both all inclusive statement and selectiveness. Besides, it must have logical force. An announcement of somethings insignificant traits may be valid, however would qualify as a definition since it doesn't clarify what that thing is; it just portrays a portion of that things properties. Eurthyphros reacts by changing his previous definition; he suggests that the devout is the thing that all the divine beings love, and scandalousness is the thing that they all despise. Socrates reacts by asking Euthyphro whether devout deeds are affirmed by the divine beings since they are devout or whether they are devout in light of the fact that they are endorsed by the divine beings. The point he needs to make here is that there is a contrast between being something and getting something. There are three things that can be said about any activity: (1) it is devout, (2) it gets endorsed by the divine beings, and (3) it is affirmed by the divine beings. The qualification between articulations (2) and (3) is that (2) manages the demonstration of endorsement by the divine beings and (3) manages the condition of the activity as being affirmed of by the divine beings. Causally, (3) must follow (2). The three cases Euthyphro makes are: (I) something gets endorsed by the divine beings since it is devout; (ii) something is affirmed of by the divine beings since it gets endorsed of by the divine beings (this case is verifiable); (iii) what is devout is what is affirmed of by the divine beings. The primary case (I) says that (2) is valid if (1) is valid, (ii) expresses that (3) is valid if (2) is valid, and (iii) expresses that (1) is proportionate to (3). Be that as it may, (I) and (ii) infer that on the off chance that (1) is genuine at that point (3) is valid, which isn't equivalent to stating that (1) is equivalent to (3). Regardless of whether (1) and (3) allude to something very similar, they don't have a similar importance. Along these lines Euthyphros can't guarantee that the meaning of devotion is what all the divine beings love without his thinking being roundabout. While Socratess contention is to be sure an incredible blow against Euthyphros definition, we will attempt to check whether it is at all conceivable to safeguard Euthyphros definition. One way do so is by returning to the inquiry that Socrates postures to him about whether that which is devout is adored by the divine beings since it is devout or whether it is devout in light of the fact that it is cherished by the divine beings. The inquiry expect that the divine beings need motivation to adore something, which isn't really the situation. In the event that the endorsement of the divine beings doesn't require a reason, at that point devotion can surely be characterized to be what the divine beings love without bringing on any irregularity. We note that what is devout is consistently devout. It doesn't appear to bode well that what is devout today will be reprobate tomorrow. It follows that what is devout today was devout yesterday, and what was devout yesterday was devout the day prec eding that, etc until we show up at the primary reason for devotion itself, which is characterized as what all the divine beings love. Under this system, devotion is the condition cherished by all the divine beings, however it is inane to ask what prompts the divine beings to adore something; that is, the thing that made the divine beings love it. Socrates would no uncertainty whine that this makes devotion a fairly self-assertive undertaking, however that ought not frustrate Euthyphro. It has just been certified that various divine beings can cherish various things. That demonstrates that the preferences of the divine beings are not founded on some higher standards, yet are in certainty discretionary. All things being equal, it is consistently conceivable that all the divine beings would all be able to adore something very similar. This can happen simply by some coincidence, yet that would at present not change that thing from being devout under Euthyphros definition. We note that Euthyphros definition is overall definition that incorporates all that is devout and rejects everything else, while having adequate logical force. While Socrates contention against Euthyphros definition is solid, it doesn't really refute the definition. By expelling the verifiable necessity that the divine beings need motivation to adore something, the definition holds up to both Socrates contention just as his prerequisites for a decent definition.

Compare Wal-Mart Essay

1.Compare Wal-Mart. com with Amazon.com. What highlights do the locales share practically speaking? Which are novel to Wal-Mart? To Amazon.com? Walmart.com and amazon.com have a great deal of similitudes. A portion of the normal highlights between the two incorporate setting up a client account, the two of them have the shopping basket include, both these sites have the inquiry bar at the highest point of the page, the two of them permit you to figure out items dependent on value, fame, importance, client survey, the two of them show you a rundown of things saw that coordinated what you looked for, the two of them have a blessing vault, buys made on the Wal-Mart can either be dispatched to your home or to a closest store either by Wal-bazaar or by an outsider merchant from the commercial center. Amazon also has tie ups with various sellers everywhere throughout the world that you can purchase from. The two sites graphically show client surveys for every thing. The two sites permit you to follow your request. The two destinations have the arrangements of the day. Amazon’s is called today’s arrangement and Wal-Mart’s is called estimation of the day. The main thing I discovered exceptional about Wal-Mart’s site is that it has a catch on the highest point of the page called ‘weekly ad’ that shows little coupons that clients can reclaim. Amazon doesn't have this element. Another contrast between the two sites is their arrival approach. Wal-Mart has a multi day merchandise exchange though Amazon has a multi day merchandise exchange. 2.Will Wal-Mart become the predominant e-posterior on the planet, supplanting Amazon.com, or will Amazon.com command Wal-Mart on the web? What variables would con-tribute to Wal-Mart’s accomplishment in the online commercial center? What components would bring down its capacity to overwhelm online deals the manner in which it has had the option to command physical retail deals in numerous business sectors? As of now, Amazon.com offers an a lot bigger and progressively fluctuated stock just as an assortment of highlights and advantages that Walmart.com can't coordinate. While Walmart’s retail locations have an enormous client base, a significant number of whom will go to Walmart.com for comfort, Walmart.com’s stock is for the most part made distinctly out of items that are accessible in Walmart stores. In the interim, Amazon has a huge range of items in for all intents and purposes each class possible, from everywhere throughout the world. What's more, Amazon has many utilized things that are accessible at lower costs, just as uncommon, vintage, and antique things that are not part of Walmart’s stock. Amazon likewise offers an online â€Å"marketplace,† where customers can interface with venders anyplace on the planet, analyze productsâ and costs, and once in a while even haggle with dealers. Quite a bit of Walmart’s predominance in the physical retail advertise is because of its plan of action of purchasing in such huge mass amounts that it can offer lower costs to clients, just as being a one-quit shopping goal; be that as it may, in light of the fact that Amazon clients can correlation shop between Amazon dealers, and in light of the fact that Amazon can offer an a lot bigger assortment of items, both of Walmart’s preferences are discredited. In this manner, it is far-fetched that Walmart.com will ever have the option to supplant Amazon. 3.Check the shopping helps offered at Wal-Mart. com. contrast them and those at Amazon. com. Walmart.com has an accessible database just as classes that permit clients to peruse through their accessible items. Indexed lists can be arranged by significance, value, client rating, top of the line, and so on. Clients can make profiles that store their delivery and charging data for accommodation, just as past request data. Requests can be followed on the web. Clients who scan for things at Walmart.com are likewise offered proposals for different items that may likewise intrigue them. Gift vouchers can be buy on the web, and gift voucher adjusts can be checked. Walmart.com additionally offers wedding and child library administrations, just as a â€Å"Wish List† that can be seen by others. A â€Å"Value of the Day† is offered to exhibit things that are at a bargain at even lower costs. Free transportation is frequently accessible on select buys. These shopping helps are pract ically identical to those on Amazon.com. Walmart.com offers one shopping help that Amazon doesn't have; numerous things can be dispatched to the customer’s closest Walmart store for nothing, which can prompt noteworthy investment funds. 4.What online administrations can be bought on Walmart.com? Walmart.com offers the accompanying administrations on the web: †¢Ã¢â‚¬ Straight Talk No-Contract Phones,† where clients can buy a prepaid telephone, have it conveyed to their location, and enacted on the web or via telephone; †¢Same-Day Photo Pickup,† which permits clients to transfer computerized photographs to Walmart.com, which would then be able to be moved onto photograph prints, mugs, cards, schedules, and so forth., or even onto banners or artificial canvases. The greater part of these items would then be able to be gotten up customer’s nearby store that equivalent day; †¢Ã¢â‚¬ Contact Lenses at Walmart,† which permits clients to enterâ their solution contact focal point data and request an assortment of brand-name contact focal points at deal costs; †¢Ã¢â‚¬ Enroll in a Medicare Part D Plan,† an assistance which enables qualified candidates to apply for Medicare, just as get limits at Walmart’s drug store; †¢Ã¢â‚¬ Walmart MoneyCenter,† which gives an assortment of m onetary administrations web based, including Visas, prepaid charge cards, cash moves, charge readiness administrations, and Bluebird, a â€Å"debit and checking alternative† supported by American Express that offers a considerable lot of indistinguishable administrations from customary banks. Likewise, the Walmart Pharmacy offers numerous administrations web based, including medicine tops off and conveyance. Walmart additionally has a Wellness Center that offers wellbeing tips and apparatuses on the web.

Uses of Literary Journalism Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words - 1

Employments of Literary Journalism - Essay Example Mitchell can cause us to feel as though we in reality live in this town and consider it to be a similar path as the townspeople. He invests energy depicting the graveyard which contains a significant part of the historical backdrop of the town and shows how they have pondered the world throughout the years. The people he meets are individuals who remove time from their day to converse with their neighbor, think about the climate, and appear to find a sense of contentment with themselves. The outside world doesn't generally barge in, on the grounds that they have a sense of safety in themselves. This is an amazing case of scholarly news-casting. The creator doesn't make the tale about himself, he makes it about the individuals and spots he visits. He gets inside their heads and shows us the world as observed through their eyes. It isn't simply straight announcing and the five Ws. It is a bit of scholarly news-casting in the manner it gives us something somewhat increasingly about our own reality that is difficult to place in straightforward words. It instructs us to require some investment to watch the waterway stream, similar to the individuals of Edgewater, do each day. â€Å"The First Family of Astoria† is about the Flavel family who is the most conspicuous family in the town. The story follows their history and the different things that have transpired throughout the years. A portion of these things are acceptable and some of them are awful. The Flavels get a great deal of consideration from others since they are notable, maybe in excess of a family like theirs would under different conditions. There are various outrages and treacheries. This is fringe abstract news coverage, as I would like to think. It is very reality driven and the style of composing isn't particularly abstract. The general thought behind it is that tattle can be malignant and connect to specific individuals paying little mind to what they do. That isn't too unique and is somewhat self-evident. By and large, this adds such a lot to the store of human information.

Interpretations of Platos Allegory of the Cave in Erasmus Praise of Folly - Literature Essay Samples

In the Praise of Folly, Erasmus creates a character critical of, yet indebted to, philosophical wisdom. Through Folly, Erasmus weaves his own ideas into her message, confusing readers unable to distinguish between the two voices. In Praise of Folly, Folly refers to Platos Allegory of the Cave from The Republic to enhance her statements of self-praise. Her interpretation of this philosophical piece strays from Platos intentions, and at the end of the text, Erasmus offers his reconciliation between the two accounts. Follys account revolves around the benefits of life in a material world, whereas Plato describes positive aspects of living in an immaterial realm of thought. Folly begins her lecture against the idea of Platonic enlightenment:To destroy the illusion is to ruin the whole play, for its really the illusion and make-up which hold the audiences eye. Now what else is the whole life of man but a sort of play? Actors come on wearing their different masks and all play their partsits all a sort of pretense, but its the only way to act out this farce (Erasmus 44). She reasons that life lacks substance beyond what the eyes perceive. She lives in a material world where the sense of sight controls ones outlook on life, and therefore people in her world only understand what is on the surface. The comedy of life (45) lies in the overall illusion of humankind. According to Folly, life is scripted and people play their assigned roles, oblivious to any other realms of existence. Folly finds joy in this lifestyle because it keeps the people, or her audience, engaged and allows justification for folly, or foolishness, to enter their lives. Folly finds outlets for self-praise by associating life with superficiality. She believes in the message of life as a theatrical illusion, and she refuses to accept any importance in life outside of the cave. Once Platonic enlightenment destroys lifes illusions, then it ruins the farce of Follys life. In the Allegory of the Cave, Plato disagrees with Follys desire of mental simplicity and fails to find it redemptive. Plato does not associate happiness or tranquility with lifes outer, material surface, but rather along the path to knowledge. Follys actors are strange prisonersno different from us (Plato 241). His use of the word prisoners identifies a limiting force, for example a mental binding, forbidding the experience of knowledge. In Platos account, people living in Follys pretense are tied up in a way which keeps them in one place and allows them to look only straight ahead, but not to turn their heads (240). Folly describes the audiences eye as the most important sense needed in life, while Plato believes that the audiences focus on costumes, or shadows cast by fire on the cave wall, (241) suggests that they live in a material, superficial world. The Allegory of the Cave makes a distinction between a tortured, inferior, material world and an intangible, superior, immaterial world of ide as. Folly maintains that inquisitive men who search for a deeper understanding of the world are disrespecting the greater force of Nature: I believe I hear the philosophers protesting that it can only be misery to live in folly, illusion, deception, ignorance. But it isnt its human. I dont see why they call it a misery when youre all born, formed, and fashioned in this pattern, and its the common lot of mankind (Erasmus 50). She continues with nature as a justification for rejecting Platos ideas. For example, by comparing humans to animals, she argues a need for humans, like animals, to settle on their natural abilities. But a horse who knows nothing of grammar isnt unhappy, and a foolish man is not unfortunate, because this is in keeping with his nature (50). Her argument states that nature gives mankind what it needs to live a happy life. Nature does not give humankind wisdom, and therefore wisdom produces unhappiness. However, Folly contradicts herself when she claims that nature hates any counterfeit and everything turns out much more happily when its unspoiled by artifice (53). Earlier, Folly compares life to a play, or a type of artifice, with no depth underneath the one dimensional surface. These two interpretations of natures wishes confuse her argument. Plato, however, believes that nature blesses humankind with an intricate and complicated world, and people like Folly live in shadows of artifice, which cover up natures requests for the pursuit of knowledge. Platos understanding with nature involves eliminating the shadows and illusions through a process of enlightenment. Platos view of enlightenment involves a reconciliation and understanding with nature, not an opposition. The sight of the prisoners, or actors, represents an imprisoned material world. The firelight corresponds with the light of the sun (Plato 244) which brightens and illumines the world to new areas of study. Moreover, the minds ascent to the intelligible realm eq uals the sight of the things on the surface of the earth (244). Folly uses Platos arguments to advocate how nature purposefully limits understanding. Plato feels that nature forms these dual worlds to increase possibilities for the human condition rather than impose limitations. In addition, people like Folly refuse to appreciate the natural boundlessness of the world and this fetters mankinds natural state away from the light of the sun. Another way in which Folly misconstrues the two accounts relates to their respective views on wisdom and its role in lifes progression: Then follows adolescence, which everyone finds delightfulyouth has so little wisdom and so few frownsas soon as the young grow up and develop the sort of mature sense which comes through experience and education, the bloom of youthful beauty begins to fade at once (then) old age with its troubles, unwelcome to others but just as much to itself (Erasmus 22).Folly explains that in the cycle of life, wisdom ages t he physical body and spirit until it becomes witless in old age before reverting back to a childhood mentality. Her description of these changes brought upon by wisdom upsets a common impression about maturity. Folly equates the acquisition of wisdom with a mental decline into immaturity. The mature children and dying elderly conform to Follys idea of nature. On the other hand, the adult population strays from natures acceptable, limited knowledge into an unfulfilling state like immaturity. But if mortals would henceforth have no truck with wisdomthere would be no more old age and they could be happy enjoying eternal youth (24). While Folly argues about unnecessary wisdom, Plato believes that wisdom is essential. According to Plato, without wisdom, humans never leave their prison cell. People whove traveled there dont want to engage in human business: theres nowhere else their minds would ever rather be than in the upper region (Plato 244). In Platos life journey to wisdo m, man finds fulfillment and substance as he progresses. The children and elderly represent happiness to Folly, yet they are useless to Plato. His allegory admits that life and the pursuit of knowledge involves pain and distress (242) yet the incorporation of wisdom into life transports one to a transcendental universe without material pain. Folly however, cares more about physical comfort through the reduction of pain and the increase in tranquility than mental accomplishment. Plato describes this world of the soul as goodness [] [that] leads one to deduce that it is responsible for everything that is right and fine, whatever the circumstances [] progenitor of light [] source and provider of truth and knowledge (242). Platos understanding of the human world as misery and the divine world as happiness contrasts with Follys understanding of life. Erasmus interpretation of Plato mediates between the two accounts, and he finds reconciliation between the privilege of wisdom and th e assurance of tranquility. Erasmus provides both an ironic and sincere interpretation of Platos Allegory of the Cave. First of all, the ironic outlook on the world occurs in Follys voice, not that of Erasmus: What difference is there, do you think, between those in Platos cave who can marvel at the shadows and images of various objects, provided they are content and dont know what they miss, and the philosopher who has emerged from the cave and sees the real things? (Erasmus 72). In the text, Erasmus means for Follys lecture to be confusing, ridiculous, and at times unjustified. This quote from Folly emphasizes the extent to which Erasmus allows her to misread a text. She admits to the existence of two worlds, the natural and unnatural, yet she ignores their differences. The evidence of contentment contradicts earlier passages where she balances the dual world based on an uneven amount of happiness. In addition, she warns readers that the pursuit of truth leads to the remova l of tranquility. This invites readers to seek out answers and doubt Follys message of truth. But Erasmus also displays a sincere side of Folly as he implements his opinions into her speech: Philosophers [] insist that they alone have wisdom and all other mortals are but fleeting shadows (Erasmus 84). Erasmus struggles with the attitudes of philosophers more than their ideas. He creates Folly as a compromise between conceit and humility. He moves away from the stereotype of the arrogant philosopher. Follys criticism of those philosophers who ignore human business (Plato 244) shows Erasmus concern for an intellectual midpoint which allows the ascent into Platos immaterial realm without the arrogant transition.Finally, Erasmus unifies Folly and Platos accounts of the Allegory of the Cave at the end of the text. Folly is converted from a rejecter of Platonic philosophy into a proponent. Erasmus reconciles the two ideas, pointing out that both Plato and Folly have correct, alth ough different, opinions of the world: The happiness which Christians seek with so many labours is nothing other than a certain kind of madness and folly. Dont be put off by the words, but consider the reality. In the first place, Christians come very near to agreeing with the Platonists that the soul is stifled and bound down by the fetters of the body, which by its gross matter prevents the soul from being able to contemplate and enjoy things as they truly areUndoubtedly this happens because the mind is beginning to free itself from contamination by the body and exercise its true natural power (Erasmus 128).Erasmus advocates the idea of Platonic enlightenment using the example of Christianity as a reason to escape the cave. The childish believer remains stifled and bound. When they question their faith, they develop personal convictions and a stronger argument for their faith. Erasmus, through the voice of Folly, notices that men on their death bed are divinely inspired thro ugh this enlightened realm, a complete change from the earlier belief about the superficial state of dying. This statement accepts Platos view while the next quote accepts Follys view.And so we have a situation which I think is not unlike the one in the myth of PlatoThis man who has gained understanding pities his companions and deplores their insanity, which confines them to such an illusion, but they in their turn laugh at him as if he were crazy and turn him out. In the same way, the common herd of men feels admiration only for the things of the body and believes that these alone exist, whereas the pious scorn whatever concerns the body and are wholly uplifted towards the contemplation of invisible things (Erasmus 129).Folly recognizes that Christianity relies on blind faith and illusions. In Platos cave, man is blind to worldly things and seeks a contemplative life, where he worships intangible ideas. The illusion of Christian belief incorporates Platos view of the divine re alm of knowledge as well as the importance of maintaining Follys illusions.The character Folly represents someone whose eyes become confused in two ways, as a result of two different sets of circumstances: it can happen in the transition from light to darkness, and also in the transition from darkness to light (Plato 244). Folly begins her lecture as a prisoner who will grab hold of anyone who tried to set them freeand kill them (244). This places Folly in the category of relative ignorance according to Plato. Her contradictions and obvious shift in opinion indicates that Folly enters a position on the brink of light. The confusion in her speech is only her adjustment period between ignorance and enlightenment. Therefore, Erasmus Praise of Folly can be read as a similar allegory where Folly begins as a prisoner unable to have intelligent conduct either of ones own private affairs or of public business, (244) and changes to a more enlightened individual as she gradually escapes her cave and adjusts to new vision in the light.Erasmus intends for the readers to challenge Follys statements in his Praise of Folly. He uses Platos Allegory of the Cave as an example of how interpretations vary. Erasmus, above all else, values the idea of questioning others beliefs. Erasmus also demonstrates that in some cases, two separate beliefs can coexist. This applies to the way Sixteenth Century humanists translate ancient texts, like Plato, and find potential danger in their philosophical wisdom. Praise of Folly promotes a message of unification between modern and ancient interpretations of life and wisdom. Works CitedErasmus. Praise of Folly and Letter to Maarten Van Dorp, 1515. Transl. by Betty Radice. London: Penguin Books, 1971.Plato. The Republic. Transl. by Robin Waterfield. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993. 240-45.

Talking about Vacations In English Activity

Talking about vacations in English is of the most common topics in a classroom, and why not? Who doesnt like to take vacations? Discussing vacations provides students with the opportunity to use travel-related vocabulary, as well as a theme that all students enjoy. This conversation lesson provides a survey that students use to choose a dream vacation for their fellow students and is  sure to encourage lots of conversation. Aim Encouraging conversation about vacations to practice travel-related vocabulary. Activity Student survey followed by a choice of dream vacation based on student input. Level Intermediate to advanced Outline Introduce the topic of vacations by telling about one of your favorite vacations.Ask students to come up with different types of vacation activities and write these on the board.If necessary or helpful, review vocabulary about travel.Give each student a vacation survey and have them pair up to interview each other.Once theyve interviewed each other, have students choose a dream vacation for their partner. This exercise can be repeated numerous times with different partners.As a class, ask each student which vacation they chose for their partner and why.  As a follow-up exercise, students can write a short essay by choosing a dream vacation and explaining the choice. Vacation Survey Which sentence best describes your feelings towards vacations? Why? My idea of a good vacation is staying at home.My idea of a good vacation is to visit a number of important cities and explore the culture.My idea of a good vacation is to travel to an exotic beach in a foreign country and then relax for two weeks.My idea of a good vacation is to put on my backpack and disappear into the hills for a few weeks. Which type of travel do you think you would like the best? Why? A long road trip in the car.A twelve-hour flight to a foreign country.A train ride across the country.A luxury cruise through the Mediterranean.   How often do you take short trips (two or three days)? I take a short trip at least once a month.I take short trips a few times a year.I take a short trip once a year.I never take short trips. If you had the chance, would you ... ... take a week trip to an exciting city.... spend a week at a meditation retreat.... visit family that you havent seen for a long time.... go white water rafting for a week. Who do you prefer to take vacations with? Why?   I prefer taking vacations with my close family.I prefer taking vacations with my extended family.I prefer taking vacations by myself.I prefer taking vacations with a good friend. What type of vacation activity sounds like the most fun? Why? Lying on the beachHanging out at a nightclubVisiting a museumSkiing down a mountain   How important is eating well to you when you are on vacation? Its the most important thing!Its important, but not for every meal.A good meal is nice, but not that important.Just give me food, so I can keep going! What type of accommodations do you prefer on vacation?   Id like a luxury suite, please.  Id prefer something close to the beach.I need a clean room, but it should be economical.Id prefer a tent and my sleeping bag.   Dream Vacations Dream Vacation I: Touring the Capitals of Europe: On this two-week vacation, youll visit the capitals of Europe including Vienna, Paris, Milan, Berlin, and London. This inclusive vacation includes tickets to a concert, play or opera in each capital, as well as tours of  castles, national monuments  as well as the most important museums such as The Louvre.​Dream Vacation II: Hanging on the Beach in Hawaii: Two weeks of sun and fun on the beach on Hawaiis dream island of Maui. Youll have a deluxe room at one of Mauis finest hotels directly on the beach. This vacation includes fine dining at some of Mauis best restaurants. During your stay, you can take scuba diving lessons, go snorkeling with thousands of tropical fish, or go whale watching in the bay. Its a dream come true!Dream Vacation III: Hiking the Peruvian Andes: Do you need to get away from it all? If so, this is the vacation for you. Youll be flown into Lima, Peru and taken into the Andes for a two-week backpacking adventure of a lifetime. Weve arranged experienced local guides to accompany you on your journey into the magnificent and mystical landscape.  Dream Vacation IV: New York Party Time!: The Big Apple! Need I say more?! Youll enjoy two weeks stay in a luxury suite in Central Park. Youll need to relax because youll be out enjoying the New York nightlife until early in the morning. This all expenses paid vacation includes dinner at some of the most exclusive restaurants in New York, and on-call car service at any time. Experience New York at its finest and most exciting.

Essay on Analysis of Platos Apology - 1445 Words

The Apology is Platos recollection and interpretation of the Trial of Socrates (399 BC). In this dialogue Socrates explains who he is and what kind of life he led. The Greek word apologia means explanation -- it is not to be confused with apologizing or being sorry for ones actions. The following is an outline of the argument or logos that Socrates used in his defense. A hypertext treatment of this dialogue is also available. I. Prologue (17a-19a) The first sentence sets the tone and direction for the entire dialogue. Socrates, in addressing the men of Athens, states that he almost forgot who he was. The speeches of his accusers had led him to this point. The dialogue will thus be a kind of recollecting by Socrates†¦show more content†¦And no rational person voluntarily harms himself. But if he harmed the youth involuntarily, then he should be instructed (educated) -- not punished. Regarding the Charge of Impiety Socrates next takes up the charge of Impiety. Could a person believe in things like clothes and yet not in human beings who wear them? So too with divine things: Since Socrates believes in a Diamon (a divine thing), it follows that he believes in divinities. IV. Socrates Interpretation of his Art (28b - 32e) Socrates, far from being an impious corruptor of the youth, is actually a blessing sent by the gods. To show this, Socrates likens himself to a GADFLY (a horsefly). Just as a gadfly constantly agitates a horse, preventiung it from becoming sluggish and going to sleep so too Socates, by (moving through the City) stirring up conversations in the marketplace, prevents the City from becoming sulggish and careless and intolerant (thinking it knows something when it doesnt). Ultimately, Socrates whole life had been a service to the City begun out of a pious response to the saying of the gods. This is the deeper refutation of the charges. It is also another positive image of Socrates: He IS a gadfly. V. Socrates Answers the Charges (33a-34b) [Notice the general movement of the defense -- Who Socrates IS NOT: He is NOT a Physicalist; he is NOT a Sophist. Who Socrates IS:Show MoreRelatedPlatos Apology And Crito Analysis1873 Words   |  8 PagesTensions between moral philosopher and the faithful citizen of the polis are highlighted in Plato’s Apology and Crito. In the Apology, Socrates is faced with a death sentence at the hands of the state, but ironically is unapologetic in his discourse while defending himself. The Crito, however, displays Socrates in a dialogue where he chooses to engage and characterize the laws as a means of arguing for his faithfulness to the decision of the polis. Indeed, he uses the laws as a rhetorical deviceRead MoreAnalysis Of Platos Apology On The Man Of Save The Day, But Not Himself1285 Words   |  6 Pagesnot Himself An Analysis of Plato’s Apology Socrates, painted as a humble man who never had any of his own writings, and often speculated to be illiterate, is considered one of the major partisans of Western philosophy. Western philosophy is the philosophical thought of the western world. This idea proves to be quite accurate when considering Plato’s Apology, the apology of Socrates which is not really considered an apology but a defense. In the ancient Greek era, the word apology meant to defendRead MoreThe Presentation of Socrates Arguements in Plato’s Apology and Crito792 Words   |  4 PagesIn both Plato’s Apology and Crito, Plato presents Socrates arguments clearly and precisely. Socrates is wise man with a different perspective on life, which presents us with a mass of contradictions. Socrates is an expressive man, yet he never recorded any works. He is ignorant, but wrongfully convicted who is willing to fight his unjust execution. Behind these dilemmas is an opposition not often explored. Socrate s is the most patriotic of philosophers, who is dedicated to his state. Exploring thisRead MoreBiography of Socrates, An Annotated Bibliography1581 Words   |  6 Pagesinterpretation of human wisdom can be given in terms of â€Å"philosophia†.He confirms his analysis by its resolution of some enduring difficulties in the interpretation of Apology and also by providing the answer as to why Socrates continued to search for knowledge which he thought was impossible to attain. He tries to explain the concept of human wisdom with the help of Socrates sayings. Overall, Dylan provides a clear analysis with the proper tone and style. Kenneth C. Blanchard, Jr. â€Å"The Enemies of Socrates:Read MoreWhat Are The Charges Against Socrates?1019 Words   |  5 PagesPHIL 1301 30 October 2015 What are the charges against Socrates as recorded in the Apology. Is he guilty of them? Why or why not? The Apology is assumed to be the most realistic account that has been conserved of Socrates defense of himself as it was presented before the Athenian Council. It is in essential agreement with the references to the trial that occur in Plato s other dialogs. We may determine that Apology is not written by Socrates and only contains the words of Socrates that were memorizedRead MorePlatos Views on Life after Death1388 Words   |  6 PagesPlatos views on life after death were manifold, and developed over time as an examination of a bevy of his literature readily indicates. However, during all phases of his writing he does demonstrate that there is in fact life after physical death, which is widely attributed to his notion of the soul. Plat always viewed the soul as an entity that was distinct from the physical body. Moreover, while the physical body was destined to die, the soul was enduring, interminable, and destined to go on somewhereRead MoreThe Reconciliation Of Two Positions16 96 Words   |  7 Pagesphilosophy, but the legacy he left behind is something that is still being discussed today by historians and philosophers alike. Socrates is renowned for standing up for his beliefs even in the midst of death as portrayed in Plato’s account of Socrates’ defense speech, Apology, in which he gave during his 339 B.C. trial. It is in this eminent speech that Socrates is able show the dedication he has for philosophy, even going as far as to say that he would rather die than to ever cease practicing philosophyRead MorePlato1819 Words   |  8 PagesSupposed Contradiction in Plato’s Apology and Crito Ben Blanks, Lynchburg College (Editor’s note: This essay by Ben Blanks is the winner of the North Award for the best paper in the 2012 Agora. Ben presented an earlier version of this paper at the ACTC Student Conference at Pepperdine University in Malibu, California, in March, 2011.) When reading the Apology and the Crito of Plato, one inevitably comes upon a seeming fundamental contradiction between the two dialogues. The Apology presents readers withRead MoreCritical Analysis of Plato‚Äà ´s Apology 40c-42a2143 Words   |  9 PagesCritical Analysis of Plato’s Apology 40c-42a Plato’s Apology is one of the most well-known pieces of Plato’s writing today, perhaps due to a certain dramatic style and context that can appeal to any reader. The ‘Apology’ is the defence speech of Socrates before the court at a trial for his life. He has been accused of deliberately corrupting the young and of non-belief in the Athenians’ gods. It is widely accepted that this is a true event, Socrates was tried, found guilty and put to death. WhatRead MoreA Summary On Socrates s Apology1332 Words   |  6 PagesBF299-BR3-BR4 23 March 2016 Socrates’s Attentive Apology The fight to do what is right is not an easy path to traverse, but is one which demands a noble and enduring character. Defending principles of justice with logic and reason in the face of political opposition, is a difficult task to take, but the elusive Socrates boldly undertook this endeavor. In Plato’s Apology, he recalls the daring defence of the principles of truth that Socrates took against all odds. Plato’s recollections, much like the trial of

Project Initiation – Case study

Question: Describe about the Project Initiation Case study. Answer: Introduction: In accordance with the task requirement criteria an attempt shall be considered to address the mentioned tasks of this particular assignment. The major inclusions of this assignment are a brief SWOT analysis based on the information provided in the case scenario, a blueprint of project charter plan and a communication plan relevant to the topic of discussion. SWOT ANALSIS This segment shall perform a brief SWOT analysis in compliance to the details provided in the given case scenario: Strength: The geographical location of the school with respect to its recognition The presence of few number of student in per class as an approach to effectively management the students The inclination towards adapting the applications of information and technology The presence of requisite amount of financial support for incorporation of information and technology setup within the school The positive response of the school administration towards incorporation of inputs fro PWC and co. PWC Weakness: The lack of awareness regarding the operational benefits of information and technology system within the staff members of the school The absence of the required man power to handle the student management related tasks The small operational network of the school with presence of mostly part time teachers Opportunities: The initiatives and support given by the higher administrative segment towards incorporation of information and technology system within the school The presently embedded operational division in the school has eased the development of IT setup The positive approach of the school administration towards incorporation of a IT development plan along with a proper mission and vision The high budget sanctioned by school administration Threat: The increasing pressure of student population The lesser number of staffs and teachers present in the school The absence of proper information technology support system to handle the administrative works and management issues of the school The time duration (only 3 months) that has been allotted for development of information and technology support system within the school Prepare Project Charter Basic details of the project: Project name: IT infrastructure establishment in Willow Brook School, Midwest, United States Email address of the project manager: Project tenure: 3 months Project budget: $80000.00 Project objectives: To embed an effective and stable IT support system within the school in order to ease and fasten the administrative and management works of the school To reduce the pressure of manual handling of school records and also to minimise the occurrence of errors while copying of information from one document to another To aid in effective management of the student records To improve the operational efficiency of the school administration To aid in strengthening the expansion niche of the school Primary deliverables of the project: Installation of internet line and internet connection within the administrative blocks of the school. Installation of computer system with Microsoft Office and PDF converter software Installation of relevant software that aid in checking the errors in the texts (eg: Grammerly software) Installation of Linux operating system and BASIC Installation of Google Chrome and Firefox Mozilla within each system Limitations of the project: The project will not include installation of computer language software namely C+, C++, Java, COBOL, FORTRAN, Pascal, Algol and Prolog Acceptance Criteria of the Project: The delivery of resources particularly the materials required for installation of IT support system within the school is an important criterion related with the project. Apart from this obtaining feedback from PwC regarding the project is another criterion. It is also required to complete the IT support system within the stipulated time before the beginning of the new academic session (Garton McCulloch, 2012). Assumptions and Constraints of project: The primary limitation of this project is mainly the stipulated time period. Additionally availability of adequate space for setting up of the new IT infrastructure can also be a limitation (Wiegers, 2010). Stakeholders List: Executive Director of the school Victoria Ownes, Principal Mrs. Kathy Giliard, Administrative assistant Michelle Madrid, Susan Brown and the other teachers and administrative staff members associated with Willow Brook school of Midwest, United States are the major stakeholders attached with this particular project. Lessons learnt: It is always better to obtain the official permission before beginning of the project related work as to avoid the occurrence of undesired official conflicts. Further it is also a wise decision to specify all the requirements of the project along with an estimate of the expenses for this project for smoothing operation of the project work (Oosthuizen Venter, 2011). Charter Sign off: It is mandatory for every individual who have been enlisted in the stakeholders list to produce their complete signature in the project consent document and other related papers before beginning of the project work. Prepare Communications Plan: One of the primary requirements for initiation of an IT developmental project is formulation of a communication plan that should be relevant and also suffice the key requirements of the project operational activities. Prior presenting the detailed communication plan it is important to have an insight regarding the lateral, downward and upward communication process. The lateral or horizontal communication process reflect information exchange between professionals holding similar ranks with respect to their designation with an organization while downward communication include the practice of information sharing with the lower strata (Jones, 2007). The information sharing process with the higher strata in the professional domain is considered as upward communication plan. For development of this particular project communication plan is very essential and priority has been given towards both upward and downward communication process. The major stakeholders who have been included within t his communication plan are the principal; vice principle the teachers and the administrative staff of the concerned school (Purba Shah, 2000). Furthermore greater emphasis shall be given to convey information regarding the developmental status of the project, details regarding the amount of fund invested and the further official and other requirements of this project. Also the details regarding the purchase of resources have also been considered to be communicated by upward communication process. However providing the required information of how should the implemented IT support system can be useful for the employees has also been included within this particular plan. In context of frequency of communicating with the employees of the school fortnightly meeting with the schools stakeholders has been considered in order share the project status and other issues related with the project (Wiegers, 2010). Face to face communication or through kickoff meetings has been considered as a process of communicating. Project report presentation on monthly basis to the board of directors of the schools is included within the communicatio n plan. Hence the main purpose of communication plan is to deliver updated information regarding the project status to the school administration. However any changes or modifications in project that are require to be discussed with the school administration has also been included within the plan. The school office has been decided as the venue for exchange of project information (Dinsmore Cabanis-Brewin, 2011). Conclusion: In consideration to the information provided in the previous segments of this particular assignment it can be inferred that the task requirements were critically addressed. References: Dinsmore, P. Cabanis-Brewin, J. (2011).The AMA handbook of project management. New York: American Management Association. Garton, C. McCulloch, E. (2012).Fundamentals of Technology Project Management. Chicago: MC Press. Jones, R. (2007).Project management survival. London: Kogan Page. Oosthuizen, T. Venter, R. (2011).Project management in perspective. Southern Africa: Oxford University Press. Purba, S. Shah, B. (2000).How to manage a successful software project. New York: Wiley. Wiegers, K. (2010).Practical Project Initiation. Sebastopol: Microsoft Press.